41. Nose leading... Leg twisting... Pro's

41. Nose leading... Leg twisting... Pro's

Secure Home | Search | About
 Electronic Security in UK    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
41. Nose leading... Leg twisting... Pro's -pull 06-22-2005
Posted by on June 22, 2005, 6:05 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

So called "hands-on pro's" always attempt to justify the reliability
of wireless alarm systems without manufacturer specifications and
support.
Its so simple to have the manufacturer specify / warrant theyre
product reliability against Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)..
Who knows better than the product designer, -tester, -producer?
Why do manufacturers not specify that attempt of "hands-on pro's" who
explain a imaginative RFI detection system?

Does the salesman;
Does the installer;
or
Does the monitoring agent know better?
They seems to be the only who know that the night owl cry (RFI
detection) don't exist; NO ALARM during RFI, but they don't tell that
to everybody!

Who attempt purchaser "nose leading", some call that "Leg twisting"?


At least it seems that I succeed with the "so called" alarm pro's and
they're imaginative unsuccessful and unjustified statements subject
wireless alarm systems reliability during RFI.

By the way, do somebody have a small tool called "nose players", it
will allow to twist "so called" pro's verbal juice even more.

I don't think that you have "nose players" oversees but its not
required, it seems that you have "jumping beans" instead...
A lot of "jumping beans" are present in this NG at least.



Similar ThreadsPosted
48. New readers, Pro's are UNprofessional July 5, 2005, 12:26 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy