19/ Do France beat the US with dual frequency dual band systems..

19/ Do France beat the US with dual frequency dual band systems..

Secure Home | Search | About
 Electronic Security in UK    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
19/ Do France beat the US with dual frequency dual band systems.. -pull 05-27-2005
Posted by on May 27, 2005, 5:52 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Do France beat the US...

I have been informed that at least 2 French manufacturers (DIATEM &
DIAGRAL) have designed theyre wireless alarm system receivers and
transmitters to operate on "dual frequency" on "dual bands".
Even if it don't solve (can't) the RFI muzzling problem, at least it
"may" minimize them.

This require that two individual receivers are used (?).
I still like to see theyre specifications, its maybe just sales talk
without ground like usual in the US.

In the mean time, wireless are still unreliable during Radio Frequency
Interferences (RFI) and nothing cant prevent those external
transmitted signals to be there.
The worst is that when your system is dead, it don't warn you...

Wireless Alarm Systems = Illusionary safety.



Posted by on July 2, 2005, 11:29 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:52:22 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

>
>Do France beat the US...
>
>I have been informed that at least 2 French manufacturers (DIATEM &
>DIAGRAL) have designed theyre wireless alarm system receivers and
>transmitters to operate on "dual frequency" on "dual bands".
> Even if it don't solve (can't) the RFI muzzling problem, at least it
>"may" minimize them.
>
>This require that two individual receivers are used (?).
> I still like to see theyre specifications, its maybe just sales talk
>without ground like usual in the US.
>
>In the mean time, wireless are still unreliable during Radio Frequency
>Interferences (RFI) and nothing cant prevent those external
>transmitted signals to be there.
> The worst is that when your system is dead, it don't warn you...
>
>Wireless Alarm Systems = Illusionary safety.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: LOOKING FOR "DUAL MODE" CCTV cameras July 13, 2006, 6:28 pm
Re: False Alarm on Dual Tech Passive October 11, 2006, 4:48 am
Re: 44. Why are wireless alarm systems... June 25, 2005, 5:21 am
Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems May 29, 2005, 7:08 pm
Re: 15. Wired / Wireless alarm systems? May 28, 2005, 12:49 am
VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems May 27, 2005, 5:59 am
Grants for rural alarm systems? October 13, 2005, 3:42 pm
43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems June 23, 2005, 5:44 pm
Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems February 26, 2006, 9:28 am
Wireless alarm systems INTERFERING sources May 27, 2005, 5:49 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy