It's offical: Massachusetts goes with standards based office software

It's offical: Massachusetts goes with standards based office software

Secure Home | Search | About

Computer Software Security - Computer security - desktop and server software, encryption and similar subjects 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
It's offical: Massachusetts goes with standards based office software Imhotep 09-24-2005
Posted by Imhotep on September 24, 2005, 10:22 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
The point of this article is simple. Going with standards based solutions
just makes sense. It prevents vendor dependence (and vendor abuse) as well
as helps prevent interoperability problems.


"The bottom line is this: whose documents are they? Do the people of
Massachusetts have the right to control their own documents? Does a
governmental agency have the right to decide what software it wishes to
use, particularly if it believes it can save money? If it does, then all
the hue and cry is pointless. And the real issue, as Kriss pointed out, is
the issue of sovereignty, and the very important issues of access and
control not only now but also in the distant future."

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050923142231938

Imhotep


Posted by Imhotep on September 25, 2005, 9:37 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Imhotep wrote:

> The point of this article is simple. Going with standards based solutions
> just makes sense. It prevents vendor dependence (and vendor abuse) as well
> as helps prevent interoperability problems.
>
>
> "The bottom line is this: whose documents are they? Do the people of
> Massachusetts have the right to control their own documents? Does a
> governmental agency have the right to decide what software it wishes to
> use, particularly if it believes it can save money? If it does, then all
> the hue and cry is pointless. And the real issue, as Kriss pointed out, is
> the issue of sovereignty, and the very important issues of access and
> control not only now but also in the distant future."
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050923142231938
>
> Imhotep

A open letter from kde to Microsoft over the issue of Massachusetts ditching
MS Office...

http://dot.kde.org/1127515635/

Im


Similar ThreadsPosted
Sr Software Engineer, Woburn, Massachusetts June 2, 2005, 3:01 pm
Massachusetts is migrating to open-source software September 7, 2005, 2:46 am
Treatise on Script-Based User Software Profiling September 17, 2007, 12:22 am
Treasury Office Faults IRS Computer Security (SmartPros Accounting) October 20, 2008, 12:10 pm
security standards October 18, 2006, 1:58 pm
International Call for Open Standards September 9, 2005, 3:19 pm
Trusted Computing standards won't apply to Vista September 9, 2005, 12:55 am
What hardware based Firewalls are you using? June 28, 2005, 5:19 pm
Are You Looking For A Serious Home Based Business? January 30, 2006, 4:40 pm
Image-based security codes August 20, 2005, 5:43 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy