|
Posted by mikey on June 3, 2005, 5:05 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> They look great professionals with theyre "finger in the wind"
> techniques to detect RFI...
>
> That's where "so called" professionals experiance is comming from head
> to bottom, they have mechanical feelings!
>
> RFI brain probe
> \ /
> ____\/____
> / ___ ___ \
> / / @ \/ @ \ \
> \ \___/\___/ /\
> \____\/____/||
> \Bottle/
> |neck | Pro's in
> / \ Pissing
> / \ Contest
> | \
> | |
> / |
> | ===. 10 mW
> \ OO \ output
> | | o power!
> | / o
> \_________/ o
> || || \___,,,__ /
> || || | WAS |O
> _||_||_ \_______/
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> >No. You didn't 'show'... you said. Very different thing. By the way,
you're
> >stupid :-)
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
> >> systems in several posts.
> >> I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
> >> more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
> >> By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
> >> headphone;
> >>
> >> Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
> >> theyre experience = no RFI warning.
> >>
> >> I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
> >> from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
> >> and interferences.
> >> I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
> >> are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
> >> (you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).
> >>
> >> I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
> >> error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
> >> level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
> >> communication.
> >> The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
> >> and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.
> >>
> >> WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
> >> data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
> >> comparisons to wired systems.
> >> Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
> >> theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?
> >>
> >
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map