Warning: iconv_mime_decode() [function.iconv-mime-decode]: Malformed string in /home/secureg/public_html/lib/standard.lib.php on line 2255

Warning: iconv_mime_decode() [function.iconv-mime-decode]: Malformed string in /home/secureg/public_html/lib/standard.lib.php on line 2255

Warning: iconv_mime_decode() [function.iconv-mime-decode]: Malformed string in /home/secureg/public_html/lib/standard.lib.php on line 2255

Warning: iconv_mime_decode() [function.iconv-mime-decode]: Malformed string in /home/secureg/public_html/lib/standard.lib.php on line 2255
Preferred RootKit detection/removal tool?
Preferred RootKit detection/removal tool?

Preferred RootKit detection/removal tool?

Secure Home | Search | About

Microsoft Applications Security - Microsoft's general security discussions and announcements 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Preferred RootKit detection/removal tool? Spin 08-16-2008
Posted by FromTheRafters on August 20, 2008, 3:34 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Yes, but formating and partitioning are two different
things. Even when partitioning is the subject, IIRC
the boot areas are not fixed by default unless there
is no marker (flag?) found indicating there is a valid
boot sector present.

Anyway - when rootkits or other very sticky malware
are concerned it is best to fix the boot axis as well as
making the data stored by the filesystem inaccessible
or invalid. Format addresses the latter, but not the
former (unless they changed something I am not aware
of). :o)

Fixmbr or fdisk /mbr probably - or the old bootsect.exe
'bootsect write bootsect.bak' sound familiar?

>I believe that if you delete all the partitions from the drive, apply the
>changes and then create a new partition - a new MBR is created. A boot
>sector virus should not survive this action.
>
> I seem to remember that I did just that about 8 years ago to remove a boot
> sector virus from a friends computer.
>
> But then, it was 8 years ago! (-:
>
> --
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows Desktop Experience
>
>
>> If your OS has been severely compromised, you don't want to
>> use the copy of format.com that is on that machine to do the
>> format. In the old days, the "rootkit" was a collection of utilities
>> and tools that were modified from their original to something
>> perhaps nefarious. If someone had root access they could
>> replace the formatting tool with one that only appears to format
>> the drive. As long as the act of formatting and reinstalling touches
>> the boot axis areas of the disk then any trace of malware should
>> be overwritten or no longer linked to.
>>
>> There is some malware (I forget the name(s)) that affect the boot
>> areas of the disk, and IIRC simple format won't affect that area.
>> You probably are just left with an unbootable drive unless the
>> area is repaired.
>>
>>>A simple format and reinstall is sufficient to have a fresh clean copy of
>>>the OS without malware.
>>>
>>> Multi-pass wipes aren't necessary unless you want to ensure there's
>>> nothing remaining when you sell or give away the drive.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Riley
>>> steve.riley@microsoft.com
>>> http://blogs.technet.com/steriley
>>> http://www.protectyourwindowsnetwork.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thank you. For instance, a DOD wipe is done before a clean
>>>> installation for
>>>> better safety and security. I would imagine, the only true safety on a
>>>> drive
>>>> is to perform this and then totally annihilate the hard drive if it
>>>> contains
>>>> classified and/or sensitive information.
>>>>
>>>> "FromTheRafters" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wipe is "cleaner" than format, and reload is dependent on
>>>>> exactly what is reloaded.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Steve and Robear, I was wondering if that was as clean as a format
>>>>> > and
>>>>> > clean
>>>>> > install or is my wording just different and means the same thing.
>>>>> > <?>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> 9 times out of 10, we end up ripping them out by the roots...or
>>>>> >> doing a
>>>>> >> "wipe & reload."
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>>>>> >> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>>>>> >> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>>>>> >> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Spin wrote:
>>>>> >> > I know Symantec offers RootKit detection tools, as does Panda
>>>>> >> > Security,
>>>>> >> > F-Secure, to name a few. However, this is addressed to those of
>>>>> >> > you in
>>>>> >> > this
>>>>> >> > newsgroup, which of those do you prefer to use "out in the
>>>>> >> > field"?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>



Posted by FromTheRafters on August 19, 2008, 9:09 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


You only need DOD level overwrites if you intend to
erradicate most all probability that anyone can obtain
any valid data from the drive. Removing a early boot
axis rootkit doesn't require that much - a simple one
time pass of overwite will do. The difference between
a format and a simple wipe is just that a format won't
touch all of the boot areas on the disk.

To remove malicious data from a disk does not require
seven+ overwrites or halftracking. In fact wiping isn't
even really necessary as long as whatever you do does
also touch the areas involved in the boot axis.

> Thank you. For instance, a DOD wipe is done before a clean installation
> for
> better safety and security. I would imagine, the only true safety on a
> drive
> is to perform this and then totally annihilate the hard drive if it
> contains
> classified and/or sensitive information.
>
> "FromTheRafters" wrote:
>
>> Wipe is "cleaner" than format, and reload is dependent on
>> exactly what is reloaded.
>>
>> > Steve and Robear, I was wondering if that was as clean as a format and
>> > clean
>> > install or is my wording just different and means the same thing. <?>
>> >
>> > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> 9 times out of 10, we end up ripping them out by the roots...or doing
>> >> a
>> >> "wipe & reload."
>> >> --
>> >> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> >> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
>> >> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
>> >> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>> >>
>> >> Spin wrote:
>> >> > I know Symantec offers RootKit detection tools, as does Panda
>> >> > Security,
>> >> > F-Secure, to name a few. However, this is addressed to those of you
>> >> > in
>> >> > this
>> >> > newsgroup, which of those do you prefer to use "out in the field"?
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>



Posted by =?Utf-8?B?RGFu?= on August 20, 2008, 12:07 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Thanks for your replies.

"FromTheRafters" wrote:

> You only need DOD level overwrites if you intend to
> erradicate most all probability that anyone can obtain
> any valid data from the drive. Removing a early boot
> axis rootkit doesn't require that much - a simple one
> time pass of overwite will do. The difference between
> a format and a simple wipe is just that a format won't
> touch all of the boot areas on the disk.
>
> To remove malicious data from a disk does not require
> seven+ overwrites or halftracking. In fact wiping isn't
> even really necessary as long as whatever you do does
> also touch the areas involved in the boot axis.
>
> > Thank you. For instance, a DOD wipe is done before a clean installation
> > for
> > better safety and security. I would imagine, the only true safety on a
> > drive
> > is to perform this and then totally annihilate the hard drive if it
> > contains
> > classified and/or sensitive information.
> >
> > "FromTheRafters" wrote:
> >
> >> Wipe is "cleaner" than format, and reload is dependent on
> >> exactly what is reloaded.
> >>
> >> > Steve and Robear, I was wondering if that was as clean as a format and
> >> > clean
> >> > install or is my wording just different and means the same thing. <?>
> >> >
> >> > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 9 times out of 10, we end up ripping them out by the roots...or doing
> >> >> a
> >> >> "wipe & reload."
> >> >> --
> >> >> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> >> >> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
> >> >> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
> >> >> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
> >> >>
> >> >> Spin wrote:
> >> >> > I know Symantec offers RootKit detection tools, as does Panda
> >> >> > Security,
> >> >> > F-Secure, to name a few. However, this is addressed to those of you
> >> >> > in
> >> >> > this
> >> >> > newsgroup, which of those do you prefer to use "out in the field"?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Posted by Roger Abell [MVP] on August 20, 2008, 7:08 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Spin,
Your subject asks about detection, whereas it seem responses have
been about cleanup once a system has one. The only real way that
I am aware of for detection that does cover both major divisions of
root kits requires an offline analysis of the machine to be confirmed
"probably" root kit free.
So that does rule out most of the tools in the class you mentioned.
Roger

> Gurus,
>
> I know Symantec offers RootKit detection tools, as does Panda Security,
> F-Secure, to name a few. However, this is addressed to those of you in
> this newsgroup, which of those do you prefer to use "out in the field"?
>
> --
> Spin



Similar ThreadsPosted
Rootkit vs Rootkit July 13, 2005, 9:25 am
Adware, Spyware, rootkit???? March 9, 2006, 6:31 pm
Trojan Using Sony DRM Rootkit Spotted November 10, 2005, 6:24 pm
rootkit reveal showing mismatch URL Protocol April 5, 2006, 9:25 am
Report: PC security weakened by Sony (Rootkit) uninstaller November 19, 2005, 12:30 am
RE: Best way to create clean Windows XP boot cd for running rootkit de November 20, 2005, 5:10 pm
Removal and forensics of advanced rootkit employing Shadow Walker technology - help needed!!! July 15, 2006, 5:24 am
Evebntcombmt Tool August 5, 2008, 1:42 pm
Scanning tool for MS Patches October 11, 2005, 11:26 am
Looking for some (free) tool like sitekiosk... November 5, 2005, 4:41 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy