looking for a suitable proxy

looking for a suitable proxy

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
looking for a suitable proxy unstablemicroso 07-05-2006
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?dW5zdGFibGVtaWNyb3Nv on July 5, 2006, 6:53 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi. I've posted about proxy's before, but now I know better what and how I
want to protect myself.

Using security services that have a very high security, such as those that
send heavily encrypted data, can be counterproductive and attract attention,
because someone who would use one of those would probably have something to
hide. Wouldn't the NSA or the Israelities/israelies (?) be interested ?

I'm just looking for a secure proxy, without taking extreme measures with
regard to security. A proxy service through which a lot of traffic would go
would be good, I'm less likely to be noticed that way. In the first place I
want to protect myself against criminals, hackers, nosy people, organizations
and yes, I don't want Big Brother (the state) looking over my shoulder. A
proxy in control by a non-profit organization or some other organization that
would fight for my privacy, even if pressed by law or security officials or
advanced social engineering, would probably be good. Is more anonymity better
?

I wonder in which Homeland Security would be interested ...

Also important is speed. Often, proxies slow down speed, and I'm using a
broadband connection. Essentially my computer name AND IP are static, would
proxies hide them ?

I know you can't get 100% anonymity, but that's ok.

What about www.the-cloak.com ?

I live in Western Europe. Any recommendations ?

Thank you.

Posted by Alun Jones on July 5, 2006, 8:54 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Using security services that have a very high security, such as those that
> send heavily encrypted data, can be counterproductive and attract
> attention,
> because someone who would use one of those would probably have something
> to
> hide. Wouldn't the NSA or the Israelities/israelies (?) be interested ?

Hardly - there's a lot of traffic going across the Internet in SSL right
now, and I doubt there's a lot that can be done about intercepting and
decoding that.

> I'm just looking for a secure proxy, without taking extreme measures with
> regard to security. A proxy service through which a lot of traffic would
> go
> would be good, I'm less likely to be noticed that way. In the first place
> I
> want to protect myself against criminals, hackers, nosy people,
> organizations
> and yes, I don't want Big Brother (the state) looking over my shoulder. A
> proxy in control by a non-profit organization or some other organization
> that
> would fight for my privacy, even if pressed by law or security officials
> or
> advanced social engineering, would probably be good. Is more anonymity
> better
> ?

Why don't you just ... not send stuff over the Internet? Then super-smart
crypto-hackers can't scan and intercept your traffic.

> I wonder in which Homeland Security would be interested ...

If they have a legitimate reason to be interested in you, then you really
shouldn't be given advice on how to encrypt. If they have an illegitimate
reason to be interested in you, they will waste their money and time trying
to figure out what useless trivia you think is important to your small (to
them) life - and that's good too, because they'll eventually figure out that
it's not a good thing.

> Also important is speed. Often, proxies slow down speed, and I'm using a
> broadband connection. Essentially my computer name AND IP are static,
> would
> proxies hide them ?
>
> I know you can't get 100% anonymity, but that's ok.
>
> What about www.the-cloak.com ?
>
> I live in Western Europe. Any recommendations ?

Yes. Paranoia is not a good state to be living in, no matter what part of
the world you inhibit.

Alun.
~~~~



Posted by Mark Randall on July 6, 2006, 1:48 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>to be living in, no matter what part of the world you inhibit.

Unless you live in the US, then its usually well justified...

Anyhow, there are actually very strict laws in Europe regarding what can be
stored, or exchanged or monitored, of course as soon as your packets hit the
US its fair game for them, you'd think the NSA would have better things to
do though, I hear they are programming a 13 dimensional version of pong.

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk

"We're Systems and Networks..."
"It's our job to know..."

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk

"We're Systems and Networks..."
"It's our job to know..."

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk

"We're Systems and Networks..."
"It's our job to know..."

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk

"You are tired of reading this signature now"



Posted by S. Pidgorny on July 6, 2006, 6:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I think the author of the original question wants a so-called "privacy
proxy" ("anonymizer"). There are many such services available on the
Internet. A real paranoid wouldn't use them, as any trust over the Internet
is questionnable - and you don't really know who operates those services.

BTW proxies are a big part of the cybercrime scene. Addresses sold with
stolen credit cards etc.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-

> >state to be living in, no matter what part of the world you inhibit.
>
> Unless you live in the US, then its usually well justified...
>
> Anyhow, there are actually very strict laws in Europe regarding what can
> be stored, or exchanged or monitored, of course as soon as your packets
> hit the US its fair game for them, you'd think the NSA would have better
> things to do though, I hear they are programming a 13 dimensional version
> of pong.
>
> --
> - Mark Randall
> http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk
>
> "We're Systems and Networks..."
> "It's our job to know..."
>


Similar ThreadsPosted
signcode via proxy May 16, 2006, 3:39 am
"Reverse" proxy available. Any need to put web servers in DMZ ? June 16, 2005, 2:43 pm
Best Anonymous Proxy for Winxp ?? August 1, 2005, 9:03 pm
Proxy server vs. DNS Forwarders February 6, 2006, 11:33 am
block Proxy servers April 27, 2007, 9:48 am
1yz.info - Anonymous Proxy December 24, 2007, 3:18 am
Proxy override question... October 26, 2008, 7:21 pm
viewing websites using a proxy site August 19, 2006, 6:44 am
GPO blocks proxy settings off network May 29, 2008, 10:33 am
Featured Proxy for 28 July 2008! July 28, 2008, 12:49 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy