Why was IE6 vulnerable to the wmf exploit?

Why was IE6 vulnerable to the wmf exploit?

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Why was IE6 vulnerable to the wmf exploit? ~greg 01-05-2006
Posted by ~greg on January 5, 2006, 7:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

( I read that even IE6 on XP with sp2 was vulnerable. )


However, I read this here:
http://bclary.com/2004/09/26/boot-camp-content-type

quote:

Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP, Service Pack 2 introduces
a new setting under Tools->Internet Options->Security settings
where you can choose to Disable Open files based on content,
not file extension. Choosing Disable will make Internet Explore
respect the Content Type at least in some circumstances.
Unfortunately, this setting is not disabled by default.
However, should a future exploit in Internet Explorer be discovered
which takes advantage of the Content Type guessing,
you can probably expect an update to Internet Explorer
which disables Content Type guessing.

unquote.


And I did that (--disabled "Open files based on content, not file extension",
- under Security > Custom Level... > Miscellaneous )
when I got sp2.

Seems to me that while that itself wouldn't protect
against .wmf files, it should have protected against
.wmf files masquerading as other types of images, no?

~greg



Posted by Mark Randall on January 5, 2006, 8:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wmf is identified by a starting series of bytes, not really the extension.

All systems are vunerable, install the 3rd party patch.

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk
http://zetech.swehli.com

"Those people that think they know everything are a great annoyance to those
of us who do"
Isaac Asimov
>
> ( I read that even IE6 on XP with sp2 was vulnerable. )
>
>
> However, I read this here:
> http://bclary.com/2004/09/26/boot-camp-content-type
>
> quote:
>
> Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP, Service Pack 2 introduces
> a new setting under Tools->Internet Options->Security settings
> where you can choose to Disable Open files based on content,
> not file extension. Choosing Disable will make Internet Explore
> respect the Content Type at least in some circumstances.
> Unfortunately, this setting is not disabled by default.
> However, should a future exploit in Internet Explorer be discovered
> which takes advantage of the Content Type guessing,
> you can probably expect an update to Internet Explorer
> which disables Content Type guessing.
>
> unquote.
>
>
> And I did that (--disabled "Open files based on content, not file
> extension",
> - under Security > Custom Level... > Miscellaneous )
> when I got sp2.
>
> Seems to me that while that itself wouldn't protect
> against .wmf files, it should have protected against
> .wmf files masquerading as other types of images, no?
>
> ~greg
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Vulnerable, Outdated, Dangerous DLLS May 8, 2008, 4:12 pm
Latest Matrox PowerDesk SE distributes vulnerable DLLs May 20, 2007, 9:01 pm
Virtual PC 2007 (SP1) silently installs vulnerable MSXML6 May 16, 2008, 1:52 pm
Re: Zero-day IE exploit... November 23, 2005, 7:13 am
Zero-day IE exploit... November 22, 2005, 7:46 pm
Possible new exploit... Have you seen these? April 26, 2006, 2:03 pm
Re: Where is the IE zero day exploit in the news... November 27, 2005, 2:12 pm
Dcom Exploit May 16, 2008, 2:14 pm
Bloodhound.Exploit.54 bundled with I.E.beta7 ?? June 3, 2006, 2:43 pm
My machine was compromised via mshta.exe. Is this a new exploit? July 28, 2006, 9:28 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy