|
Posted by Special Access on July 7, 2008, 8:46 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:20:52 -0500, "Kevin Hatfield"
You're only paranoid if the whole world ISN'T out to get you <grin>
Shouldn't hurt if you secure the directories from all but system and
admin (read: remove EVERYONE group) as these are your "trusted" folks.
Also helps if you are behind (multiple) firewall(s)
Mike
>Kind of funny though :)
>
>He is correct - those directories are being deleted due to the high
>probability of being attacked by viruses/malware. The filenames
>are being deleted because they can either be manipulated or exploited. This
>seems a little paranoid..
>
>Shouldn't actually hurt anything, though.
>
>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:55:17 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
>>
>>>Mike wrote:
>>>> I was told that the security regulations at my organization require
>>>> me to delete the following files. I was curious if anyone could
>>>> tell me why and possible consequences. Thanks for any help.
>>>>
>>>> Delete:
>>>> ir* : c:\winnt\inf
>>>> c:\winnt\inf\system32\drivers
>>>> c:\winnt\inf\system32\drivers\dllcache
>>>>
>>>> netir* : all directories
>>>> nscirda*: all directories
>>>> Posix: all directories
>>>> os2*.exe: all directories
>>>> *.ex_ : all directories
>>>
>>>Who told you this?
>>>
>>>--
>>>Shenan Stanley
>>> MS-MVP
>>
>> Most likely an over-anxious security person. Even DISA (used to
>> secure Gov't computer systems) doesn't require you to delete all of
>> those files. POSIX and OS2, yes... but not the rest, especially the
>> dllcache directory!
>>
>> Most security folks are of the mindset to eliminate any possibility of
>> compromise. For example, I can take an ex_ file and expand it to
>> allow me to use the exe that is being blocked by security settings
>> elsewhere. This may be stopped by setting the security the same, but
>> most security folks don't think that's enough of a prevention method.
>> Protection in multiple layers, in case one layer is compromised there
>> is another.
>>
>> Mike
>
|