|
Posted by Brian Komar \(MVP\) on April 2, 2008, 8:15 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options The domain controller certificate will work for smart card authentication.
You meed to look at the KB article on enabling smart card auth certs from
3rd paty CAs.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281245/en-us
Does the certificate contain the user's UPN in the subject alternative name
Is the CA in the NTAuth store
Are all CRLs and CA certificates for the 3rd party chain available
Brian
> Thanks for the response. I have read the articles, have a question.
>
> We have smartcards issued by a third party ca, and have the root-ca's
> certificate listed in the places mentioned in the articles. Our
> DomainController Certificate is not from the Same CA that issued the
> SmartCards Certificates. The Certificate is from our Enterprise CA. We
> are
> currently using the DomainController template, which doesn't list
> SmartCard
> Logon as a property.
>
> Does the DomainController's certificate contain the SmartCard Logon
> property? If so, How can I add the SmartCard Logon property to the
> DomainController Template or do I need to upgrade to Enterprise Edition?
>
> Don Jones
>
> "Dobromir Todorov" wrote:
>
>> Try this if you are looking at a third party (non-Microsoft) CA, or
>> Microsoft Standalone CA.
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281245
>>
>> If you are looking at your own, Microsoft Enterprise CAs, you'd suggest
>> that
>> you go for a longer read here:
>>
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/40c46d0e-f4a1-4b27-8b45-f09b448130ae1033.mspx?mfr=true
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> HTH,
>> Dobromir
>>
>> Visit http://www.iamechanics.com
>>
>> > Can someone direct me to some articles that explain how to configure AD
>> > for
>> > Smart Card Authentication? If read various articles and they were not
>> > clear
>> > as to what is required and how to implement smartcard authentication.
>> >
>> > If this isn't the correct group, please let me know what the correct
>> > group
>> > would be.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Don Jones
>>
>>
>>
|