|
Posted by Dobromir Todorov on March 14, 2008, 12:37 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Now you need to prove that what he was doing was 'tampering'.
Here is a defintion from Wikipedia:
"Tampering involves the deliberate altering or adulteration of a product,
package, or system. Solutions may involve all phases of product production,
distribution, logistics, sale, and use."
If the law where you are uses a similar definition, do you think that what
he was doing was 'tampering'?
Regards,
Dob
--
---
HTH,
Dobromir
Visit http://www.iamechanics.com
> From: "Why Is This So Complicated"
>
> | You might want to check with an employment lawyer before you fire the
> guy.
> | You don't want to bring a lawsuit down on yourself for accidentally
> violating
> | the law. Even 'at will' employees (meaning those who aren't guaranteed
> | employment for x years) have rights not to be terminated in violation of
> the
> | law. Just a thought. Good luck.
> |
>
>
> I've got news for you. Tampering with the company's assets gives an
> employer full rights to
> terminate.
> The employee has NO rights to tamper with the company computer system.
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
>
| 
XML site map