Re: Folder encryption

Re: Folder encryption

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Re: Folder encryption Robin Colleen Moore 01-04-2007
|--> Re: Folder encryption Robin Colleen M...01-04-2007
Posted by Robin Colleen Moore on January 4, 2007, 2:24 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> The program PGP? Dunno I don't use it.

I don't think even the freeware PGP can create an encrypted folder on
Windows XP.

At best, I think, the freeware PGP can encrypt a folder and its contents to
an encrypted file, but the use model everyone wants is a folder that works
like a normal folder but any file put in it can only be "taken out" in a
session where the password is supplied at least once during that session.

I'll try the other suggestions and let you know if they supply an encrypted
folder. The freeware "Cryptainer LE" suggestion looks promising but it uses
128 bit blowfish encryption. That name alone scares me.

Is "128 bit blowfish" encryption secure?

Robin



On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:55:04 -0600, ellis_jay wrote:
> Robin Colleen Moore wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:57:14 -0600, ellis_jay wrote:
>>
>>> co10 wrote:
>>>> I have a folder on my computer that I wish to
>>>> restrict access, and to restrict access in DOS, Safe Mode etc.
>>>> Can anyone recommend any freeware for the job.
>>
>>> English version of AFS
>>> http://www.osborn-software.net/
>>
>> This AFS recommendation sounded useful except I looked up the
>> Advanced File Security freeware program at and it says on the FAQ
>> that AFS can't encrypt folders.
>>
>> From the AFS FAQ http://www.osborn-software.net/afs3_faq_frame.html
>> Q: Can I prohibit access to folders with AFS?
>> A: No, AFS can't prohibit the access to folders.
>> Because folder access rights are dependend from the operating
>> system and so the only possibilty to grant authorized access is
>> encryption.
>
> I forgot about that. And I use the program...mybad...
>
>>
>> Alas, it would be nice to have one folder with automatic encryption to
>> store confidential files. Do you think PGP will automatically encrypt
>> and decrypt access to a folder instead?
>
> The program PGP? Dunno I don't use it.

Posted by Robin Colleen Moore on January 4, 2007, 3:34 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:01:36 GMT, Father Guido wrote:
>>Is "128 bit blowfish" encryption secure?
> Blowfish is a good encryption method.

Thanks.

By the way, WATCH OUT for that #5 suggestion in this thread!

Given that the "Cryptainer LE" freeware folder encryption is limited to 25
Mb, and given that the version 3.03 download of InstantLockLite seems to
actually be the version 2.5 shareware, I'm testing the third
recommendation:

#5 of http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Search/folder_lock.html
which is Secrecy File and Folder Hider 2.4.0.0
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Utilities/File_Cataloging_Utilities/Secrecy_File_and_Folder_Hider.html
whose homepage is http://www.secrethider.com/

However, when you install this "secrecy file and folder" supposed
"freeware", you must accept TWO agreements! One called "User License
Agreement" to install the software and ANOTHER one to agree to something
called "New.net Domains Terms and Conditions" (but you can't agree unless
you're 18 years or older). Huh?

These conditions scare me (do they scare you?).

For example, they say:
"The primary functions of New.net Domains are enabled by the
installation of certain software components in the Winsock
Layered Service Provider (LSP) stack of your computer.
LSP components must be installed and removed properly;
otherwise, you can lose your Internet connection."

Would YOU agree to this "New.net Domains" additional agreement (which
apparently installs something into your browser address bar whether or not
you want it to which they explain by saying "New.net Domains overrides any
competing applications with similar functionality such as Internet
Explorer.".

Huh? Is this Secrecy File and Folder Hider really freeware or is it a
trojan masquarading as freware?








Posted by B-Man on January 4, 2007, 4:01 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
if you want to use Cryptainer i would be glad to email you a free serial as
i have ALOT i had 10 computers in my residence and they have since become
too old to even bother booting

the serial would give you Cryptainer PE which has a virtual drive size limit
of 25GB and 448bit Blowfish ( yes blowfish is a secure ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM
not tropical dinosaur )

please email me for this code if you wish,
Brian M

>> The program PGP? Dunno I don't use it.
>
> I don't think even the freeware PGP can create an encrypted folder on
> Windows XP.
>
> At best, I think, the freeware PGP can encrypt a folder and its contents
> to
> an encrypted file, but the use model everyone wants is a folder that works
> like a normal folder but any file put in it can only be "taken out" in a
> session where the password is supplied at least once during that session.
>
> I'll try the other suggestions and let you know if they supply an
> encrypted
> folder. The freeware "Cryptainer LE" suggestion looks promising but it
> uses
> 128 bit blowfish encryption. That name alone scares me.
>
> Is "128 bit blowfish" encryption secure?
>
> Robin
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:55:04 -0600, ellis_jay wrote:
>> Robin Colleen Moore wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:57:14 -0600, ellis_jay wrote:
>>>
>>>> co10 wrote:
>>>>> I have a folder on my computer that I wish to
>>>>> restrict access, and to restrict access in DOS, Safe Mode etc.
>>>>> Can anyone recommend any freeware for the job.
>>>
>>>> English version of AFS
>>>> http://www.osborn-software.net/
>>>
>>> This AFS recommendation sounded useful except I looked up the
>>> Advanced File Security freeware program at and it says on the FAQ
>>> that AFS can't encrypt folders.
>>>
>>> From the AFS FAQ http://www.osborn-software.net/afs3_faq_frame.html
>>> Q: Can I prohibit access to folders with AFS?
>>> A: No, AFS can't prohibit the access to folders.
>>> Because folder access rights are dependend from the operating
>>> system and so the only possibilty to grant authorized access is
>>> encryption.
>>
>> I forgot about that. And I use the program...mybad...
>>
>>>
>>> Alas, it would be nice to have one folder with automatic encryption to
>>> store confidential files. Do you think PGP will automatically encrypt
>>> and decrypt access to a folder instead?
>>
>> The program PGP? Dunno I don't use it.



Posted by on January 5, 2007, 8:36 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello Robin,

I am late to this thread and, since I do not see the entire
conversation, am likely missing a few details. My apologies if I repeat
anything.

The first question that pops into my mind is why you are looking for a
3rd party encryption utility? Windows XP comes with built-in
encryption. This is Encrypting File System (EFS). I use it all the time
and it works well.

> Is "128 bit blowfish" encryption secure?

Relatively, yes. Blowfish is an older symmetric block cipher. EFS uses
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), which is also symmetric cipher. AES
is newer than Blowfish and has a larger key space (256 versus 128). As
a general rule, the larger the keyspace, the more secure the
encyrption.

> What does it mean to disable Windows data execution protection?

I would be very wary of disabling DEP, as you are weakening your
overall security posture.

>From Microsoft: "Data Execution Prevention (DEP) is a set of hardware
and software technologies that perform additional checks on memory to
help prevent malicious code from running on a system. ... DEP can help
block a class of security intrusions. Specifically, DEP can help block
a malicious program in which a virus or other type of attack has
injected a process with additional code and then tries to run the
injected code."

Regards,

J Wolfgang Goerlich


Related Links:

Best practices for the Encrypting File System
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223316

A detailed description of the Data Execution Prevention (DEP) feature
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352


Posted by on January 5, 2007, 8:36 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello Robin,

I am late to this thread and, since I do not see the entire
conversation, am likely missing a few details. My apologies if I repeat
anything.

The first question that pops into my mind is why you are looking for a
3rd party encryption utility? Windows XP comes with built-in
encryption. This is Encrypting File System (EFS). I use it all the time
and it works well.

> Is "128 bit blowfish" encryption secure?

Relatively, yes. Blowfish is an older symmetric block cipher. EFS uses
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), which is also symmetric cipher. AES
is newer than Blowfish and has a larger key space (256 versus 128). As
a general rule, the larger the keyspace, the more secure the
encyrption.

> What does it mean to disable Windows data execution protection?

I would be very wary of disabling DEP, as you are weakening your
overall security posture.

>From Microsoft: "Data Execution Prevention (DEP) is a set of hardware
and software technologies that perform additional checks on memory to
help prevent malicious code from running on a system. ... DEP can help
block a class of security intrusions. Specifically, DEP can help block
a malicious program in which a virus or other type of attack has
injected a process with additional code and then tries to run the
injected code."

Regards,

J Wolfgang Goerlich


Related Links:

Best practices for the Encrypting File System
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223316

A detailed description of the Data Execution Prevention (DEP) feature
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352


Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 2:30 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 2:39 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 2:48 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 4:38 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 4:56 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 5:16 am
Re: Folder encryption January 4, 2007, 5:33 am
Folder encryption February 27, 2008, 11:09 am
Re: File/Folder encryption - Compliancy with PCI November 24, 2005, 11:21 am
File/Folder encryption - Compliancy with PCI September 28, 2005, 5:31 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy