RE: Securing NT after support withdrawn

RE: Securing NT after support withdrawn

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
RE: Securing NT after support withdrawn Randrew 11-23-2005
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?UmFuZHJldw==?= on November 23, 2005, 2:27 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi,

Visit the site: www.fortinet.com
I think it is the best solution for you.

Good luck

Andrew

"rhodesm@yahoo.com" wrote:

> Any recommendations for securing NT going forward? My shop has a
> couple hundred Windows servers, but a handful cannot be upgraded from
> NT 4.0 due to legacy applications. These are internal-use servers
> only. Has anyone attempted to create a quasi-safe environment for such
> a situation? One approach might be to isolate them behind an
> additional internal firewall and allow only the very few
> ports/protocols in use by those servers. Any thoughts? Seen any
> articles? I've searched but haven't turned up anything.
>
> Thanks.
>
>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Securing NT after support withdrawn November 21, 2005, 10:25 am
Help! Securing a file February 12, 2006, 12:57 pm
Zone Alarm Support July 11, 2005, 8:15 am
Vendor support security September 19, 2005, 10:29 am
ANN: Looking for Windows Defender support? April 4, 2006, 6:22 pm
SAML support by Microsoft April 14, 2006, 1:31 pm
ANN: Looking for Windows Defender support? April 15, 2006, 9:50 pm
ANN: Looking for Windows Defender support? April 25, 2006, 8:27 pm
Windows 98 / ME Support Ended July 11, 2006, 11:12 am
Support for Windows 2003 October 18, 2006, 6:46 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy