OWA/ISA Flaw?

OWA/ISA Flaw?

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
OWA/ISA Flaw? JLawrence 05-04-2006
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?Skxhd3JlbmNl?= on May 4, 2006, 5:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Below is an old post that is exactly the issue I ran into when publishing
OWA on an ISA 2K4 server caused other users to login to someone else's
mailbox. Has there been any fix for this? I can't seem to find much on the
internet about this issue and MS doesn't seem to have anything on there site
(at least from my searching).

Thanks,
--
Jeremy Lawrence
MCP, MCSA, MCSE+S, CEH

Has there been any movement on this issue? I've got the same problem
on my network and it is just too big a security hole to allow to
continue. I've seen a lot of scuttlebutt on the UseNet about the
problem, but nobody seems to have a real solution.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Al Blake wrote:
> OK
> I have found out what is happening and a work around - but it is not
a real
> fix.
> I spent 3 days testing OWA access from the Outside (through ISA)
using a
> win98 'problem' machine and a WinXP 'new' machine.
> It seems that the are problems with the caching of incoming web
requests.
> This means that the ISA box is caching all the incoming OWA stuff.
When it
> receives a request to http://mailserver.ourdns.domain/exchange/ from
a
> different user it
> simply hands back all the info it already has to the client, which
starts to
> build the inbox OF THE LAST LOGGED ON USER!
>
> It is only when it encounters something that needs 'authentication'
that it
> prompts the user for username and password. This is AFTER it has
built
> 'Inbox - UserA' and displayed on UserBs browser but (usually) before
it
> actually displays any messages. If there are problems with the
> authentication mechnism - like the win98 box outlined below it may
build the
> whole thing.
>
> I knew that caching might be an issue so I already had a rule in my
ISA box
> to PREVENT caching of requests to the mail server. It doesnt work. My
rule
> is:
>
> Destination set: mailserver
> Action: Retrieve directly from specified destination.
>
> This should prevent ANY caching of content for that server. It
doesnt. If I
> connect to the OWA server after another user I get their mailbox
constructed
> on my browser BEFORE I get authenticated.
>
> I have confirmed that this is the problem by dropping the incoming
web
> listener and publishing the mail server via a server publishing rule
on port
> 443 (SSL). Since doing this I have not encountered that 'wrong
mailbox'
> problem - which is a relief. I now get prompted to authenticate
BEFORE
> anything gets to my browser. However, this is not ideal as by going
down
> this route I have lost the functionality of the web proxy (ie setting
up
> different rules for different host names).
> Can anyone confirm whether it is possible to TOTALLY disable caching
on
> incoming web requests for a listener?
>
> The problem above was coupled with a second problem applicable only
to
> specific browser/OS combinations. Its seems that the win98/IE6
machine I was
> using to test with CANNOT cope if integrated authentication is
enabled on
> the mail server. Netscape on the same machine is quite happy and
connects to
> OWA without problems - but it uses Basic authentication. IE will not
connect
> and reports 'server not found or dns error' unless integrated
authentication
> is disabled at the server .
> As soon as I disabled Integrated Auth on the OWA server IE quite
happily
> connects and prompts for credentials. I only allow connectivity by
SSL this
> is not too much of a drama - except that I now have to create a
separate
> virtual server under IIS to support my internal LAN users who DO want
> integrated auithentication.
>
> So, two weird problems contributed to the scenario we encountered.
The
> 'inbound caching' one is really worrying because it means that any
user
> could be shown any other users mailbox. Has anyone got a sure fire
way to
> diable this (other than by publishing the port directly which is what
I have
> just done).
>
> Regards
> Al Blake Australia
>
>
> > Please dont tell me this cant happen. It has. I watched it myself
this
> > afternoon with two other experienced engineers:
> >
> > - OWA2k published through ISA server to internet. We allow basic
and
> > integrated authentication at the ISA server and on the ex2k virtual
> servers
> > - SSL access only allowed (443).
> > - SOME clients (100+ out of 1200+) cannot connect to OWA from their
home
> > pcs. When they attempt to connect to OWA mailbox URL they NEVER get
> prompted
> > for authentication but get a "Server or dns error" displayed.
> > - If the SAME clients try to connect to a public folder published
for
> > anonymous access, still using SSL they connect without
difficutlties. (so
> > the certificate and the 128 bit browser stuff is ok)
> > - OCCASIONALLY (we saw it today) they will get connected to an OWA
mailbox
> > that IS NOT THEIR OWN!
> >
> > This is very scary and real. I really have no idea what is going on
but
> our
> > hypothesis is that the message back to the client from the Ex2k
server is
> > getting corrupted by ISA in such a way that some clients cant
understand
> it?
> > Instead of 'please authenticate' they just get 'server problem'.
Even
> > worse - sometimes ISA gets the credentials of one authenticated
connection
> > (current or previous) and applies them to a DIFFERENT
connection...or at
> > least this is what we think is happening.
> >
> > Has any one got any ideas on this? The clients are all running late
model
> > browsers (we just upgraded the one we were testing today from IE5.5
to IE
> > 6.0 but get the same result). Why dont the users get an
authentication
> > prompt?
> > Getting an unauthenticated user connected to a random mailbox
completely
> > blows any OWA security out of the water.
> >
> > Al Blake, Australia
> >

Similar ThreadsPosted
Yet another new outlook and IE security flaw discovered... September 9, 2005, 12:46 am
IE Flaw Puts Windows XP SP2 At Risk September 17, 2005, 3:07 pm
RE: Users urged to fix browser flaw April 11, 2006, 4:18 am
Bot spreads using latest Windows flaw August 15, 2006, 9:09 pm
Attacks prompt third parties to fix flaw October 3, 2006, 1:02 am
Microsoft fixes imperfect picture flaw November 8, 2005, 10:21 pm
Flaw finders lay siege to Microsoft Office July 24, 2006, 10:25 pm
Exploit released for unpatched ActiveX flaw September 15, 2006, 5:46 pm
Patched Flaw Could Have Broken Internet Backbone July 12, 2008, 11:56 am
Security Flaw: Any website can read your clipboard text September 18, 2005, 9:58 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy