|
Posted by Shenan Stanley on February 2, 2007, 10:35 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> I had been wondering how Google knew my System was infected from
> just trying to log on?
PA Bear wrote:
> Please see this page http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm then post back
> to this thread with the information we'd need to be able to assist
> you properly.
C. Wilder wrote:
> Only if you go here and get back to *me*
>
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html
Shenan Stanley wrote:
> The difference I see...
> PA Bear (and many of the rest) were left to figure out what you
> even meant.
>
> I had no trouble following that PA Bear did not understand what
> you were posting and thus directed you to a place where you might
> learn how to post a question on a newsgroup where 99.9999999% of
> the participants cannot see your machine, cannot know what you
> did, cannot do much without you providing necessary/complete
> information.
>
> Sure - PA Bear 'top-posted' - I bottom posted and I made the
> thread look organized.
> Should *I* complain you did not do the same?
> I think not.
>
> Syntax vs. lack of information.
> I seldom care about the former, but a lack of information leaves
> little to go on.
>
> Not to mention, taking your post as written...
> You already figured out what the issue was...
> Have you been wondering or had you been wondering and figured it
> all out? heh *grin*
C.Wilder wrote:
> I am sorry if I was to vague. I can understand an answer that says
> "You are to vague". Now I am left to sift through rules that are
> not consistant with 99.9999% of the rest of the *regulars* and
> wonder what the problem
> is?
>
> I did not find my question all that confusing and after a review I
> still see it the same way. Unless *no one* is aware that Google
> can detect infected systems.
>
> I did not see any need for 99.9999% to *see* my machine as I
> already stated if *was* infected.
>
> Thus the question. "How did Google know my System w(a)s infected."
>
> Did I miss anyting?
Shenan Stanley wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Welcome to MICROSOFT.public.security.
> Your questions about a Google product or service should be directed
> towards Google and their support.
>
> If you had asked your question in a Google support
> forum/channel/newsgroup/direct to Google tech support - maybe it
> would not need as many details.
>
> Google what?
> Google - as in www.google.com?
> A Google service as in http://www.gmail.com or
> http://groups.google.com? A Google provided application like Google
> Toolbar or Google Desktop?
> Perhaps a Google for Mobile device application?
>
> What was the exact message that lead you to believe that whatever
> 'Google' service/app/web page you are talking about knew you were
> infected? And what were you infected with according to Google
> XXXXX? And What did Google XXXXX tell you to do?
C.Wilder wrote:
> My recent security issues had been addressed and solved by advice
> from posters in this group. I saw a direct connection with my
> System's security issue and the topic of this post. I was mistaken
> and for that I am sorry. What is so hard about giving someone a
> clue to what the issue is instead of this guessing game.
>
> There is no order on this group.That is plain to see by anyone. Top
> posting is rude by most standards but not if you are above the
> rules on your favorite group. Those that live in a glass internet
> should not troll thyself.
>
> Now wouldn't one think that a simple answer would have solved all
> this instead of self righteousness.
>
> Why not just take a chill pill and call it a week.
Why not answer the questions and provide the additional information anyone
would need to help you instead of avoiuding it and making nothing but
excuses?
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
| 
XML site map