Elusive Pages

Elusive Pages

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Applications Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Elusive Pages Alpha24 03-17-2007
---> Re: Elusive Pages Roger Abell [MV...03-18-2007
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?QWxwaGEyNA==?= on March 17, 2007, 2:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi. I stumbled on some very interesting pages yesterday whilst in a
tearing hurry to complete an urgent Google search and I did a quick "Add to
Favourites" so I could go back later. However, there was no entry in the
list when I looked for it. My recollections were rather lacking in detail but
the pages seemed to be in the usual Web lists of sites (1-10, Next, etc)
format and, from a quick glance, the contents appeared to be a record of my
visits to various sites over the last few months.
I resumed my search today and someone may be interested know that protracted
head scratching and complex back tracking were rewarded. !! The "elusive
pages" can be found via Google Desktop ,as follows. Open Internet
Explorer>Desktop (options above search box)>Type-in URL or Subject ref: of
site you have previously visited>Click on Search Desktop. This will
produce a Web History Index which you can edit by clicking on Remove from
Index, then using check boxes and Remove button. I've no idea how
familiar this is to others but it's a revelation to me and I would be very
interested in any comments,please.

Regards, Alpha.





Posted by Roger Abell [MVP] on March 18, 2007, 10:50 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Are you speaking of how the Google desktop search is
persisting info about use made of it?
I am under the impression that for most people there is
a fairly detailed history of search queries also profiled
on the search servers.

Roger

> Hi. I stumbled on some very interesting pages yesterday whilst in a
> tearing hurry to complete an urgent Google search and I did a quick "Add
> to
> Favourites" so I could go back later. However, there was no entry in
> the
> list when I looked for it. My recollections were rather lacking in detail
> but
> the pages seemed to be in the usual Web lists of sites (1-10, Next, etc)
> format and, from a quick glance, the contents appeared to be a record of
> my
> visits to various sites over the last few months.
> I resumed my search today and someone may be interested know that
> protracted
> head scratching and complex back tracking were rewarded. !! The
> "elusive
> pages" can be found via Google Desktop ,as follows. Open Internet
> Explorer>Desktop (options above search box)>Type-in URL or Subject ref: of
> site you have previously visited>Click on Search Desktop. This will
> produce a Web History Index which you can edit by clicking on Remove from
> Index, then using check boxes and Remove button. I've no idea how
> familiar this is to others but it's a revelation to me and I would be very
> interested in any comments,please.
>
> Regards, Alpha.
>
>
>
>



Posted by =?Utf-8?B?QWxwaGEyNA==?= on March 18, 2007, 4:34 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


"Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:

> 1)Are you speaking of how the Google desktop search is
> persisting info about use made of it?
> 2)I am under the impression that for most people there is
> a fairly detailed history of search queries also profiled
> on the search servers.
>
> Roger



Hi Roger. 1) Yes. 2) I presume you are referring to the (normally)
inaccessible Index.dat files and I regard the Desktop search records as being
in a similar category. I'm well aware that there are widely differing views
about these sorts of "hidden" records but I consider them to be intrusive.


Regards, Alpha.

Posted by Roger Abell [MVP] on March 18, 2007, 5:52 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>
>
> "Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> 1)Are you speaking of how the Google desktop search is
>> persisting info about use made of it?
>> 2)I am under the impression that for most people there is
>> a fairly detailed history of search queries also profiled
>> on the search servers.
>
> Hi Roger. 1) Yes. 2) I presume you are referring to the (normally)
> inaccessible Index.dat files and I regard the Desktop search records as
> being
> in a similar category. I'm well aware that there are widely differing
> views
> about these sorts of "hidden" records but I consider them to be intrusive.
>
2) Actually I was referring to reports of attempts by the gov (US)
to get access to archives of past searches stored at the major search
provider companies. We all know that identity, or lack of it, tied to
our surfing history is extremely hard to keep anonymous.




Posted by =?Utf-8?B?QWxwaGEyNA==?= on March 19, 2007, 5:46 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


"Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:

>
> >
> >
> > "Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> 1)Are you speaking of how the Google desktop search is
> >> persisting info about use made of it?
> >> 2)I am under the impression that for most people there is
> >> a fairly detailed history of search queries also profiled
> >> on the search servers.
> >
> > Hi Roger. 1) Yes. 2) I presume you are referring to the (normally)
> > inaccessible Index.dat files and I regard the Desktop search records as
> > being
> > in a similar category. I'm well aware that there are widely differing
> > views
> > about these sorts of "hidden" records but I consider them to be intrusive.
> >
> 2) Actually I was referring to reports of attempts by the gov (US)
> to get access to archives of past searches stored at the major search
> provider companies. We all know that identity, or lack of it, tied to
> our surfing history is extremely hard to keep anonymous.
>
>
> Hi Roger. Re. 2) Sorry I misunderstood. I agree with what you say in
your second sentence but I think it is up to the individual to be as anonymous
as possible by utilising the available cleaning programs etc. The existence
of the Google Desktop records was news to me and I suspect to many others, which
was why I was anxious to track them down and give the information some publicity.

Regards,
Alpha.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Pages Blocked... August 2, 2006, 8:43 pm
Random links in my web pages August 23, 2005, 12:35 pm
who could lock pages in memory September 17, 2005, 8:19 am
Lock pages in memory October 27, 2005, 9:16 am
RE: Are there any **** password revealer for web pages and NOT only fo August 14, 2006, 5:59 pm
continual request for pages that don't exixst August 4, 2005, 10:31 am
should administrator lock pages in memory? September 18, 2005, 9:20 pm
Fingerprint Reader Not Recognizing Log In Pages. August 15, 2007, 4:26 pm
ebapi sending blank pages to printer November 21, 2005, 5:21 am
How to restrict users to access web pages all exept one July 8, 2006, 2:03 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy