|
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?SmFtZXMgQnVsbG9jaw== on August 8, 2007, 6:14 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Sorry, realised i'd not put the correct words in the header! any assistance
much appreciated.
"James Bullock" wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My question is this: we have our wireless setup pretty much identical to the
> description in this white paper:
>
http://download.microsoft.com/download/f/d/d/fdd4d246-eabe-4a3e-a935-358532b5c168/StepSecureWirelessAcc.doc#_Toc100984847
>
> We have a working, established PKI infrastructure and all Cisco 1100 ap's
> globally. We are using microsoft IAS with both a user and computer RAP. both
> of these appear to work fine and the network is firmly in production.
>
> It seems to work very well on the whole, machines are connected whilst users
> arent logged on so they receive gpo updates etc, when a user logs on they
> authenticate fine, providing they have previously been on the computer whilst
> it is connected to a wired network. If they havent been on the machine via a
> wired connection before there first log on on that machine then the machine
> does not have a local copy of their certificate, neither can it auto-enrol
> their certificate as it has no connectivity once they are logged on.
> Consequently the wireless sticks on authenticating or "no certificate" in
> these circumstances.
>
> What i'd like is to somehow allow people to request/enrol a certificate when
> logging onto the machine for the first time over wireless (rather than having
> to first put them on the wired network), is it possible to specify limited
> access during logon so the users account is able to connect to the pki box
> and enrol a new user certificate? maybe with an additional remote access
> policy?
>
> We have absolutely no problems with the distribution of computer certificates.
>
> I acknowledge that its fully possible that my implementation is at fault
> here! As i cant find any indication that the behaviour i'm experiencing has
> been a problem for anyone else!
>
>
> Any advice/pointers greatly appreciated.
>
> Jim
>
|