|
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?RWRkaWU=?= on December 15, 2005, 11:36 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Are you people serious? What does this have to do with my question?
"Jon Phipps" wrote:
> I happily use both thanks
> > People who use the word "virii" also like to use the word "whilst" ;-)
> >
> > Tom
> > |
> > || medically no it is virii, the word is latin
> > |
> > | No. read the URLs I referenced, they explain quite clearly, better than
> > I
> > can.
> > |
> > | The Latin connection with "virii" quite simply does not exist. "Virus"
> > is
> > derived from Latin
> > | (it meant slime, poison, or venom), however "virii" is not a valid Latin
> > word. Latin does
> > | not actually have a plural for virus (this is not so unusual when you
> > consider words such as
> > | slime or sheep). Latin does have a word "viri", but it is the plural of
> > the word man
> > | ("vir"), and thus nothing to do with viruses. For this topic, I will
> > refer
> > you to people who
> > | know more about it than me.
> > |
> > | http://spl.haxial.net/viruses.html
> > |
> > |
> > | --
> > | Dave
> > | http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> > | http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
>
>
>
|