Will this work??

Will this work??

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Antivirus Discussions    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Will this work?? Mackster 09-10-2005
Posted by =?Utf-8?B?TWFja3N0ZXI=?= on September 10, 2005, 2:38 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi,
Just a question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a try
asking :-)
Currently Microsoft offers MSN Messenger, yahoo offer the Yahoo Messenger,
and their are other such products. In all these chat products their is a
facility to use them using a HTTP proxy, the information and settings for
which are stored in the Registry (using regedit you can find it).
What if a worm was made, which created a proxy on the infected machine,
changed the registry settings such that the HTTP proxy was said to use
127.0.0.1 as the Proxy server, and any port can be used. Now, taking MSN
Messenger as an example, if the Worm lets say ran the proxy on Port 1999 and
changed the registry for MSN Messenger to use to connect to the internet
using HTTP proxy on port 1999. Now, as the MSN will connect through the Worm
Proxy, the worm will have the data incoming and outgoing being sent by the
MSN messenger, so
1. A window can be opened on the Chat data and the data can be captured
To spread, MSN messenger offers the user to transfer files, as now the Worm
can have a look at the data being sent and recieved by the Messenger, it can
easily modify the file being sent and attach itself or rather send itself
first instead of the file, or send itself by attaching the file being sent
underneath it to infect the other PC to which the file is being transferred
over MSN.
Once on the other PC, if the file being sent is an executable, or let say if
the file being sent was a zip file, called filexxxx.zip, the worm changes the
file, attaches the zip file underneath it, renames the file to
filexxx.zip.pif. When the User on the other side of the chat clicks on the
file being sent, the worm gets executed, which first makes the required
changes so that it Loads as soon as Windows starts and changes the settings
for next time. It sent extract the actual file being sent and executes the
appropriate command to open the file, so that the user does not know that a
worm was executed on his / her machine.

This is just an idea, and I am not that sure this can be done, but if this
can be done, wont it have the potential of infecting a whole lot of
computers, and from the Worm Proxy, this can be used to become a backdoor or
a trojan.

Well, just an idea. Will this work ???


Posted by =?Utf-8?B?UGFuZGFfbWFu?= on September 10, 2005, 2:50 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Dear Mackster,

Don't ask stupid questions . :)
Ensure your computer,use firewall and anti-virus and leave Microsoft to
think about "those problems" .

All worms have THE POTENTIAL to infect many machines!
Worms copy itself automatically!
Have a really nice day !:)

Panda_man


"Mackster" wrote:

> Hi,
> Just a question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a try
> asking :-)
> Currently Microsoft offers MSN Messenger, yahoo offer the Yahoo Messenger,
> and their are other such products. In all these chat products their is a
> facility to use them using a HTTP proxy, the information and settings for
> which are stored in the Registry (using regedit you can find it).
> What if a worm was made, which created a proxy on the infected machine,
> changed the registry settings such that the HTTP proxy was said to use
> 127.0.0.1 as the Proxy server, and any port can be used. Now, taking MSN
> Messenger as an example, if the Worm lets say ran the proxy on Port 1999 and
> changed the registry for MSN Messenger to use to connect to the internet
> using HTTP proxy on port 1999. Now, as the MSN will connect through the Worm
> Proxy, the worm will have the data incoming and outgoing being sent by the
> MSN messenger, so
> 1. A window can be opened on the Chat data and the data can be captured
> To spread, MSN messenger offers the user to transfer files, as now the Worm
> can have a look at the data being sent and recieved by the Messenger, it can
> easily modify the file being sent and attach itself or rather send itself
> first instead of the file, or send itself by attaching the file being sent
> underneath it to infect the other PC to which the file is being transferred
> over MSN.
> Once on the other PC, if the file being sent is an executable, or let say if
> the file being sent was a zip file, called filexxxx.zip, the worm changes the
> file, attaches the zip file underneath it, renames the file to
> filexxx.zip.pif. When the User on the other side of the chat clicks on the
> file being sent, the worm gets executed, which first makes the required
> changes so that it Loads as soon as Windows starts and changes the settings
> for next time. It sent extract the actual file being sent and executes the
> appropriate command to open the file, so that the user does not know that a
> worm was executed on his / her machine.
>
> This is just an idea, and I am not that sure this can be done, but if this
> can be done, wont it have the potential of infecting a whole lot of
> computers, and from the Worm Proxy, this can be used to become a backdoor or
> a trojan.
>
> Well, just an idea. Will this work ???
>

Posted by =?Utf-8?B?TWFja3N0ZXI=?= on September 10, 2005, 3:11 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Dear Panda_Man,

Thanks for the reply and classifying this as a "Stupid Question".
First, I know WORMS have POTENTIAL TO INFECT many machines, I think even a
12 year old now would know that.
Lastly, hopefully you are not a spokesperson for Microsoft. If you are then
I assume from your answer that Microsoft does not take this a potential way
of a new worm being created. I am not saying it will work, but it can work,
then so be it, It would have been better for me to post this so called stupid
theory and question of mine somewhere else where maybe someone does answer me
back with the same respect as I would show the other person and I know such
websites.
If you and Microsoft do think this is a Stupid Question and Microsoft has
better things to do, then I wont be troubling you anymore.
Have a nice day :-) btw you have no respect for the opinion of another
person which is quite evident from the use of the word stupid.
I wish you safe computing...

--
Mackster


"Panda_man" wrote:

> Dear Mackster,
>
> Don't ask stupid questions . :)
> Ensure your computer,use firewall and anti-virus and leave Microsoft to
> think about "those problems" .
>
> All worms have THE POTENTIAL to infect many machines!
> Worms copy itself automatically!
> Have a really nice day !:)
>
> Panda_man
>
>
> "Mackster" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Just a question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a try
> > asking :-)
> > Currently Microsoft offers MSN Messenger, yahoo offer the Yahoo Messenger,
> > and their are other such products. In all these chat products their is a
> > facility to use them using a HTTP proxy, the information and settings for
> > which are stored in the Registry (using regedit you can find it).
> > What if a worm was made, which created a proxy on the infected machine,
> > changed the registry settings such that the HTTP proxy was said to use
> > 127.0.0.1 as the Proxy server, and any port can be used. Now, taking MSN
> > Messenger as an example, if the Worm lets say ran the proxy on Port 1999 and
> > changed the registry for MSN Messenger to use to connect to the internet
> > using HTTP proxy on port 1999. Now, as the MSN will connect through the Worm
> > Proxy, the worm will have the data incoming and outgoing being sent by the
> > MSN messenger, so
> > 1. A window can be opened on the Chat data and the data can be captured
> > To spread, MSN messenger offers the user to transfer files, as now the Worm
> > can have a look at the data being sent and recieved by the Messenger, it can
> > easily modify the file being sent and attach itself or rather send itself
> > first instead of the file, or send itself by attaching the file being sent
> > underneath it to infect the other PC to which the file is being transferred
> > over MSN.
> > Once on the other PC, if the file being sent is an executable, or let say if
> > the file being sent was a zip file, called filexxxx.zip, the worm changes
the
> > file, attaches the zip file underneath it, renames the file to
> > filexxx.zip.pif. When the User on the other side of the chat clicks on the
> > file being sent, the worm gets executed, which first makes the required
> > changes so that it Loads as soon as Windows starts and changes the settings
> > for next time. It sent extract the actual file being sent and executes the
> > appropriate command to open the file, so that the user does not know that a
> > worm was executed on his / her machine.
> >
> > This is just an idea, and I am not that sure this can be done, but if this
> > can be done, wont it have the potential of infecting a whole lot of
> > computers, and from the Worm Proxy, this can be used to become a backdoor or
> > a trojan.
> >
> > Well, just an idea. Will this work ???
> >

Posted by Phil Weldon on September 10, 2005, 4:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
'Makster' wrote, in part:
| Dear Panda_Man,
| Thanks for the reply and classifying this as a "Stupid Question".
_____

The apparent direction of the question was how to design malware ("Just a
question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a try asking
:-)". This newsgroup is pretty clearly aimed at how to identify malware,
how to prevent it from entering a system, and how to remove it from a
system. It is not suprising that some participants would take exception to
the tone of your inquiry; it's not the first post of its type.

One of the reasons it is recommended to read a number of post before your
first post in a newsgroup is to get a sense of what the newsgroup is about.
If you had, then perhaps you would not have posted or would have made a
different post. Certainly you would not be confused about the relationship
among the newsgroup, its participants, and Microsoft. Then perhaps we would
have been spared several intemperate subquent posts. Also newsgroups
usually function as a discussion among participants, some of whom are
silent. Directly addressing responses are off point. Keep in mind that
google.com is evidently preserving all these conversations, indexed and for
eternity.

Phil Weldon

> Dear Panda_Man,
>
> Thanks for the reply and classifying this as a "Stupid Question".
> First, I know WORMS have POTENTIAL TO INFECT many machines, I think even a
> 12 year old now would know that.
> Lastly, hopefully you are not a spokesperson for Microsoft. If you are
> then
> I assume from your answer that Microsoft does not take this a potential
> way
> of a new worm being created. I am not saying it will work, but it can
> work,
> then so be it, It would have been better for me to post this so called
> stupid
> theory and question of mine somewhere else where maybe someone does answer
> me
> back with the same respect as I would show the other person and I know
> such
> websites.
> If you and Microsoft do think this is a Stupid Question and Microsoft has
> better things to do, then I wont be troubling you anymore.
> Have a nice day :-) btw you have no respect for the opinion of another
> person which is quite evident from the use of the word stupid.
> I wish you safe computing...
>
> --
> Mackster
>
>
> "Panda_man" wrote:
>
>> Dear Mackster,
>>
>> Don't ask stupid questions . :)
>> Ensure your computer,use firewall and anti-virus and leave Microsoft to
>> think about "those problems" .
>>
>> All worms have THE POTENTIAL to infect many machines!
>> Worms copy itself automatically!
>> Have a really nice day !:)
>>
>> Panda_man
>>
>>
>> "Mackster" wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > Just a question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a
>> > try
>> > asking :-)
>> > Currently Microsoft offers MSN Messenger, yahoo offer the Yahoo
>> > Messenger,
>> > and their are other such products. In all these chat products their is
>> > a
>> > facility to use them using a HTTP proxy, the information and settings
>> > for
>> > which are stored in the Registry (using regedit you can find it).
>> > What if a worm was made, which created a proxy on the infected machine,
>> > changed the registry settings such that the HTTP proxy was said to use
>> > 127.0.0.1 as the Proxy server, and any port can be used. Now, taking
>> > MSN
>> > Messenger as an example, if the Worm lets say ran the proxy on Port
>> > 1999 and
>> > changed the registry for MSN Messenger to use to connect to the
>> > internet
>> > using HTTP proxy on port 1999. Now, as the MSN will connect through the
>> > Worm
>> > Proxy, the worm will have the data incoming and outgoing being sent by
>> > the
>> > MSN messenger, so
>> > 1. A window can be opened on the Chat data and the data can be captured
>> > To spread, MSN messenger offers the user to transfer files, as now the
>> > Worm
>> > can have a look at the data being sent and recieved by the Messenger,
>> > it can
>> > easily modify the file being sent and attach itself or rather send
>> > itself
>> > first instead of the file, or send itself by attaching the file being
>> > sent
>> > underneath it to infect the other PC to which the file is being
>> > transferred
>> > over MSN.
>> > Once on the other PC, if the file being sent is an executable, or let
>> > say if
>> > the file being sent was a zip file, called filexxxx.zip, the worm
>> > changes the
>> > file, attaches the zip file underneath it, renames the file to
>> > filexxx.zip.pif. When the User on the other side of the chat clicks on
>> > the
>> > file being sent, the worm gets executed, which first makes the required
>> > changes so that it Loads as soon as Windows starts and changes the
>> > settings
>> > for next time. It sent extract the actual file being sent and executes
>> > the
>> > appropriate command to open the file, so that the user does not know
>> > that a
>> > worm was executed on his / her machine.
>> >
>> > This is just an idea, and I am not that sure this can be done, but if
>> > this
>> > can be done, wont it have the potential of infecting a whole lot of
>> > computers, and from the Worm Proxy, this can be used to become a
>> > backdoor or
>> > a trojan.
>> >
>> > Well, just an idea. Will this work ???
>> >



Posted by Patrick Dickey on September 10, 2005, 5:28 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Phil Weldon wrote:
> 'Makster' wrote, in part:
> | Dear Panda_Man,
> | Thanks for the reply and classifying this as a "Stupid Question".
> _____
>
> The apparent direction of the question was how to design malware ("Just a
> question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a try asking
> :-)". This newsgroup is pretty clearly aimed at how to identify malware,
> how to prevent it from entering a system, and how to remove it from a
> system. It is not suprising that some participants would take exception to
> the tone of your inquiry; it's not the first post of its type.
>
> One of the reasons it is recommended to read a number of post before your
> first post in a newsgroup is to get a sense of what the newsgroup is about.
> If you had, then perhaps you would not have posted or would have made a
> different post. Certainly you would not be confused about the relationship
> among the newsgroup, its participants, and Microsoft. Then perhaps we would
> have been spared several intemperate subquent posts. Also newsgroups
> usually function as a discussion among participants, some of whom are
> silent. Directly addressing responses are off point. Keep in mind that
> google.com is evidently preserving all these conversations, indexed and for
> eternity.
>
> Phil Weldon
>
>
>>Dear Panda_Man,
>>
>>Thanks for the reply and classifying this as a "Stupid Question".
>>First, I know WORMS have POTENTIAL TO INFECT many machines, I think even a
>>12 year old now would know that.
>>Lastly, hopefully you are not a spokesperson for Microsoft. If you are
>>then
>>I assume from your answer that Microsoft does not take this a potential
>>way
>>of a new worm being created. I am not saying it will work, but it can
>>work,
>>then so be it, It would have been better for me to post this so called
>>stupid
>>theory and question of mine somewhere else where maybe someone does answer
>>me
>>back with the same respect as I would show the other person and I know
>>such
>>websites.
>>If you and Microsoft do think this is a Stupid Question and Microsoft has
>>better things to do, then I wont be troubling you anymore.
>>Have a nice day :-) btw you have no respect for the opinion of another
>>person which is quite evident from the use of the word stupid.
>>I wish you safe computing...
>>
>>--
>>Mackster
>>
>>
>>"Panda_man" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dear Mackster,
>>>
>>>Don't ask stupid questions . :)
>>>Ensure your computer,use firewall and anti-virus and leave Microsoft to
>>>think about "those problems" .
>>>
>>>All worms have THE POTENTIAL to infect many machines!
>>>Worms copy itself automatically!
>>>Have a really nice day !:)
>>>
>>>Panda_man
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mackster" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>Just a question if this theory will work, if not, then it was worth a
>>>>try
>>>>asking :-)
>>>>Currently Microsoft offers MSN Messenger, yahoo offer the Yahoo
>>>>Messenger,
>>>>and their are other such products. In all these chat products their is
>>>>a
>>>>facility to use them using a HTTP proxy, the information and settings
>>>>for
>>>>which are stored in the Registry (using regedit you can find it).
>>>>What if a worm was made, which created a proxy on the infected machine,
>>>>changed the registry settings such that the HTTP proxy was said to use
>>>>127.0.0.1 as the Proxy server, and any port can be used. Now, taking
>>>>MSN
>>>>Messenger as an example, if the Worm lets say ran the proxy on Port
>>>>1999 and
>>>>changed the registry for MSN Messenger to use to connect to the
>>>>internet
>>>>using HTTP proxy on port 1999. Now, as the MSN will connect through the
>>>>Worm
>>>>Proxy, the worm will have the data incoming and outgoing being sent by
>>>>the
>>>>MSN messenger, so
>>>>1. A window can be opened on the Chat data and the data can be captured
>>>>To spread, MSN messenger offers the user to transfer files, as now the
>>>>Worm
>>>>can have a look at the data being sent and recieved by the Messenger,
>>>>it can
>>>>easily modify the file being sent and attach itself or rather send
>>>>itself
>>>>first instead of the file, or send itself by attaching the file being
>>>>sent
>>>>underneath it to infect the other PC to which the file is being
>>>>transferred
>>>>over MSN.
>>>>Once on the other PC, if the file being sent is an executable, or let
>>>>say if
>>>>the file being sent was a zip file, called filexxxx.zip, the worm
>>>>changes the
>>>>file, attaches the zip file underneath it, renames the file to
>>>>filexxx.zip.pif. When the User on the other side of the chat clicks on
>>>>the
>>>>file being sent, the worm gets executed, which first makes the required
>>>>changes so that it Loads as soon as Windows starts and changes the
>>>>settings
>>>>for next time. It sent extract the actual file being sent and executes
>>>>the
>>>>appropriate command to open the file, so that the user does not know
>>>>that a
>>>>worm was executed on his / her machine.
>>>>
>>>>This is just an idea, and I am not that sure this can be done, but if
>>>>this
>>>>can be done, wont it have the potential of infecting a whole lot of
>>>>computers, and from the Worm Proxy, this can be used to become a
>>>>backdoor or
>>>>a trojan.
>>>>
>>>>Well, just an idea. Will this work ???
>>>>
>
>
>
Of course, if he is trying to create a virus, his ISP will love to know
about it. Mackster is forgetting that headers are a wonderful thing.
So, it won't be too hard for someone to trace any creations of his to
him. Especially since he asked about it in a Microsoft Newsgroup.

But, as I mentioned in my other reply (which was under a mistaken
impression that he wanted to know for protection purposes), MSN
Messenger is blocking ANY file type that could possibly execute code.
So, even if someone got the infection, it won't spread very far. Not my
Messenger at least. I'm sure Yahoo and AIM, along with the others are
following suit (or will be soon).

So, yes.. The theory is good, but the practice is faulty. As is the
Original Poster...

--
http://www.pats-computer-solutions.com
Smile.. someone out there cares deeply for you.

Similar ThreadsPosted
How does "immunization" work? February 20, 2006, 3:47 am
MS Antispyware updates work !!! December 12, 2005, 1:44 pm
Ctrl+Alt+Del will not work and allow me to the log on screen? August 20, 2007, 3:17 pm
Has Spyware work on Windows 95 May 24, 2008, 7:08 pm
"Restore my Active Desktop" doesn't work June 26, 2005, 10:53 pm
STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 900D July 28, 2006, 7:10 pm
internet address box won't work. Possibly I got a virus. October 9, 2005, 6:17 pm
How do boot-time disk access products work? November 22, 2006, 4:08 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy