|
Posted by Leythos on April 28, 2008, 12:14 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
says...
> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
> Microsoft
> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft *is
> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when you
> can comprehend simple logic ;)
Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly don't
understand how it works.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
|
Posted by Leo on April 28, 2008, 1:00 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Who cares? Why don't you take this crap to email?
--
Leo
"I contend that, for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity, is
like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the
handle." - Winston Churchill
> says...
>> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
>> Microsoft
>> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft *is
>> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
>> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when you
>> can comprehend simple logic ;)
>
> Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
>
> You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly don't
> understand how it works.
>
> --
> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
|
|
Posted by jen on April 29, 2008, 12:42 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > says...
>> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
>> Microsoft
>> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
>> *is
>> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
>> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
>> you
>> can comprehend simple logic ;)
> Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
> You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
> don't
> understand how it works.
You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
-jen
|
|
Posted by Tom [Pepper] Willett on April 29, 2008, 2:06 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
organizations set up their own nntp servers. Examples include the newsgroups
Microsoft run to allow peer-to-peer support of their products"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup
: > says...
: >> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
: >> Microsoft
: >> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
: >> *is
: >> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
: >> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
: >> you
: >> can comprehend simple logic ;)
: > Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
: > You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
: > don't
: > understand how it works.
:
: You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
: msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
: with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
: newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
: They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
: Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
: If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
:
: -jen
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
|
|
Posted by Tom [Pepper] Willett on April 29, 2008, 2:08 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
were more than 100,000 newsgroups. Each newsgroup is named according to a
hierarchical convention. Categories such as "rec," "comp," or "misc"
identify the general subject of the newsgroup. Additional terms are
sometimes added, uniquely defining the newsgroup within a collection of
others. Examples: comp.lang.perl.misc, rec.pets.cats,
Microsoft.public.access."
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/guide/newsgroupfaq.mspx
: > says...
: >> I repeat, *Usenet is a peer to peer network of "servers"(look it up).
: >> Microsoft
: >> does *NOT* peer with *any* other newsservers*, therefore Microsoft
: >> *is
: >> not* a part of Usenet. They simply make their *.public.* groups
: >> "available to anyone ON the Usenet". Sink in yet? Come back when
: >> you
: >> can comprehend simple logic ;)
: > Jen, you are wrong, you don't understand how it works.
: > You almost get it right and then you screw up because you clearly
: > don't
: > understand how it works.
:
: You clearly don't understand the simple fact that in order for
: msnews.microsoft.com to be *a part of Usenet*, they *have* to *PEER*
: with other newsservers. Microsoft does *NOT* peer with *any* other
: newsservers*, therefore msnews.microsoft.com *is not* a part of Usenet.
: They simply make their *.public.* groups "available to anyone *ON* the
: Usenet"(if a NSP's admin adds the microsoft.public.* hierarchy).
: If you can *prove* otherwise, I'll be glad to "apologize" ;)
:
: -jen
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | New threat | March 3, 2006, 8:16 am |
| Stress.Exe a Threat? | March 19, 2006, 8:43 am |
| New Virus Threat | May 23, 2006, 5:30 pm |
| New Virus Threat | May 23, 2006, 5:31 pm |
| how to get rid of this virus threat | July 24, 2006, 11:55 am |
| Threat Detected | October 8, 2007, 8:58 pm |
| Boot. Malmo threat | May 11, 2006, 5:20 am |
| SQL injection - the biggest threat on the web | August 20, 2008, 4:18 pm |
| w32.spybot.nlx | April 14, 2006, 9:29 pm |
| W32/SpyBot.AAQB | December 2, 2005, 8:45 pm |
|
XML site map