|
Posted by Joseph on June 28, 2005, 2:53 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options >I'm the type of person who admits that they know
nothing or at least enough to know that I know nothing of what I should
know.
The sure sign of manhood and wisdom (took me a while to uunderstand that)
>As for Symantec they're - in my opinion -
Is this irony? I can't tell, :-)
> bloated, difficult to work with, hard to contact
Now that is an understatement.
>It's good to see I'm not the only one.
No you/we are not, its just that we usually are too busy getting somwhere,
learning something while other busy themselves keeping everyone down so that
they seem to be bigger than they are.
There may be more of them that there is if us, but then again, they will
always be less leaders than troups.
'nough said. Hope to 'meet' you on another thread.
Have a nice day.
Joseph
>
> My reply is at the bottom of your sent message:
>
> <snip>
>> Interseting what reaction this mail has caused, I told in the
>> original that I copy/pasted from a comment to Symantec from their
>> weebsite, and if nothing else, what they do is to make it as hard as
>> possible to contact them. Now, here is a software that I recommand people
>> do NOT buy, as it
>> cannot possibly but any better than the lack of service that seem to
>> charactersise their website.
>>
>> Although rarely, I do after a few pages of some book, would then
>> jduge by the cover and waste no more off my time.
>> Waste your money not, spybot, trojan hunter, lavasoft are people who
>> have shown that free or not, their software DO the job that a company
>> like Symantec must choose NOT to do - you, the glazier and the bricks
>> flying thru your window...- and that's their job, done well that is.
>>
>> J O
>
> Usenet is full of people who will try to force their will on other people
> and people who will never do anything but look to cause hate and
> discontent. You learn to ignore them after a while but once in a while I
> like to post back and point out the irony in their posts. It's actually
> pretty effective at getting people to stop trolling me specifically and
> hopefully it impacts their future behavior. Me? I'm the type of person who
> admits that they know nothing or at least enough to know that I know
> nothing of what I should know.
>
> TrojanHunter is worth paying for in my opinion. One of the reasons I find
> it to be so is, at least when I decided to pay for my copy, the licensing
> agreement is for a single personal license which covers all the PCs that
> you own. I can honestly say I've never been infected with a trojan
> unintentionally with it running. As for Symantec they're - in my opinion -
> bloated, difficult to work with, hard to contact, difficult to uninstall,
> and cause far more problems than they're worth. The sad part is that
> people swear by them, pay them, and continue to do so even after
> encountering problems. If you can't depend on (and trust) your security
> software what can you trust? The products I keep are the ones that have
> proven themselves over time and in some rather difficult situations. It's
> good to see I'm not the only one.
>
> Galen
> --
>
> "And that recommendation, with the exaggerated estimate of my ability
> with which he prefaced it, was, if you will believe me, Watson, the
> very first thing which ever made me feel that a profession might be
> made out of what had up to that time been the merest hobby."
>
> Sherlock Holmes
>
| 
XML site map