|
Posted by Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\) on December 14, 2005, 11:22 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Anti-virus programs should be judged on their ability to do their job
without constant interference on the part of the computer operator.. in this
way, AVG is as good as any..
--
Mike Hall
MVP - Windows Shell/User
> Tony Susa wrote:
>> Does anyone know if Avast! was fixed yet to pass the important tests?
>>
>> While googling for more information about Avast!, I found Avast!
>> recently failed an apparently important consumer oriented test (which
>> AVG passed). My question is whether or not Avast! has been fixed with
>> respect to that failure.
>>
>
> I've used both Avast and AVG, and I wouldn't ever go back to AVG. The
> interface was confusing and the updating was spotty and unreliable. Also,
> after seeing both programs running, it's pretty obvious (at least to me)
> which was is better programming effort.
>
> Satisfied Avast user for 3 years.
>
> --
> GPC
>
>
| 
XML site map