|
Posted by RJK on December 30, 2006, 6:48 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
...knew what you meant !
...my thinking was, (and it did cross my mind that it would prolly be
desirable by more than just a few), that I would be able image a hd, then
leave multi-av churning away through the night, and during the day come to
that, on the odd machine ...now and again.
If it raises too many considerations or complications, or would take too
much time, it's not a problem - I suspect that very soon I'll play with a
batch file and bung the cls's into and ...and probably copy your switches
...maybe even read the /? screens for them ! ... I did look at them the a
couple of weeks ago, and thought oooh my goodness ....."luvly" !
...With hindisght, I thought, ...I bet that looked like I've got a cheek !
...but, that's me ...blurt it out and then spend ages apologising !
best regards, Richard
>
>
> || one after the other :-)
>
> || regards, Richard
>
>
> | Let me think about this one...
>
> My bad...
>
> Ipreviously wrote "concurrently" when I should have written
> "consecutively".
> D'oh !
>
> This *may* be possible. More thought needed. :-)
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
>
>
| 
XML site map