I have a virus that uses

I have a virus that uses "anti virus software" downloads as a cover up

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Antivirus Discussions    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
I have a virus that uses "anti virus software" downloads as a cover up routeclothing 03-24-2007
Posted by cquirke (MVP Windows shell/use on March 26, 2007, 4:25 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>On 24 Mar 2007 10:40:41 -0700, routeclothing@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>>Hello there, Today I was browsing the internet when I cam accross a
>>video I wanted to watch. It told me that I need to download some kind
>>of activeX control so I did and now I have A seemingly HUGE virus.
>>The symptoms are as follows...

>>I have new Icons on my desktop and they are supposubly (sp?) "secruity
>>programs" and now my home page is always being redirected to a site to
>>download new internet security programs and everything.

This is one of 200+ fake "antispyware" (f)utilities, and there are
tools that can clean it up.

>>I have been told that other people I know have had it but they have
>>just simply wiped their hard drive,

>which is also the only reasonable thing to do in such situation

Rubbish.

>Backup your data files and re-install windows.

Bad advice, for drive-by malware infections.

See: http://cquirke.mvps.org/reinst.htm

The fallacy is not that malware can persist after attempts to detect
and clean it (though formal methods work pretty well).

The fallacy is that "just" wiping and re-installing Windows (thus
falling back to aun unpatched, exploitable state with no up-to-date
av) and restoring "data" backups (with the risk of restoring malware)
is something that will always lead to a system that stays clean.

Google( Bart ). Much assembly required.



>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Running Windows-based av to kill active malware is like striking
a match to see if what you are standing in is water or petrol.
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

Posted by B. Nice on March 27, 2007, 2:40 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:25:35 +0200, "cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)"

>>On 24 Mar 2007 10:40:41 -0700, routeclothing@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
>
>>>Hello there, Today I was browsing the internet when I cam accross a
>>>video I wanted to watch. It told me that I need to download some kind
>>>of activeX control so I did and now I have A seemingly HUGE virus.
>>>The symptoms are as follows...
>
>>>I have new Icons on my desktop and they are supposubly (sp?) "secruity
>>>programs" and now my home page is always being redirected to a site to
>>>download new internet security programs and everything.
>
>This is one of 200+ fake "antispyware" (f)utilities, and there are
>tools that can clean it up.

If it's the only thing...

>>>I have been told that other people I know have had it but they have
>>>just simply wiped their hard drive,
>
>>which is also the only reasonable thing to do in such situation
>
>Rubbish.

You'd wish.

>>Backup your data files and re-install windows.
>
>Bad advice, for drive-by malware infections.

No. Giving "removal" tool advice without having access to a machine to
verify it afterwards is bad advice.

>See: http://cquirke.mvps.org/reinst.htm
>
>The fallacy is not that malware can persist after attempts to detect
>and clean it (though formal methods work pretty well).
>
>The fallacy is that "just" wiping and re-installing Windows (thus
>falling back to aun unpatched, exploitable state with no up-to-date
>av) and restoring "data" backups (with the risk of restoring malware)
>is something that will always lead to a system that stays clean.

I should of course have used the proper term: Flatten and rebuild.

Posted by cquirke (MVP Windows shell/use on March 27, 2007, 7:56 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:25:35 +0200, "cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)"
>>>On 24 Mar 2007 10:40:41 -0700, routeclothing@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

>>This is one of 200+ fake "antispyware" (f)utilities, and there are
>>tools that can clean it up.
>
>If it's the only thing...

Yup. There's no one malware per customer rule, and the risk profile
that let this one in may have let others in. OTOH, this malware per
se is not a RAT or trojan downloader, so it's reasonably bounded.

>>>>I have been told that other people I know have had it but they have
>>>>just simply wiped their hard drive,

>>>which is also the only reasonable thing to do in such situation

>>Rubbish.

>You'd wish.

I know...

>>>Backup your data files and re-install windows.

>>Bad advice, for drive-by malware infections.

>No. Giving "removal" tool advice without having access to a machine to
>verify it afterwards is bad advice.

If you don't have the skills to detect and clean, (and more to the
point, didn't have the skills to avoid clicking up a fake malware
alert) then you prolly don't have the skills to follow your advice,
either. So either way, it's "best effort, good luck".

>>See: http://cquirke.mvps.org/reinst.htm

>>The fallacy is not that malware can persist after attempts to detect
>>and clean it (though formal methods work pretty well).

>>The fallacy is that "just" wiping and re-installing Windows (thus
>>falling back to aun unpatched, exploitable state with no up-to-date
>>av) and restoring "data" backups (with the risk of restoring malware)
>>is something that will always lead to a system that stays clean.

>I should of course have used the proper term: Flatten and rebuild.

Same difference. You're rebuilding a duhfault install with duhfault
settings, no patches, no firewall in < XP SP2, and no updated av.

Just how long do you expect that state to stay clean?

Or do you think that being able to say "you were clean for the first
10 minutes after your first boot up" = Mission Accomplished?

I don't hear you ask about XP version, advise about firewalls or WiFi,
or mention anything about screening "backed up data" for malware.

There's no glib 2-line solution, but the difference is that following
your advice may not only fail to attain and maintain a clean state,
but may also leve the system in an unusable state, if there are
availability problems with OS CD, drivers, app installers etc.

"Just wipe and rebuild" is all very well in the rareified space of
pro-IT, with imaging facilities, all data off-system on a server
somewhere, pro-administered backups, and a docile/cowed user
population who just have to accept the collateral damage.

It's always been an unacceptably high-impact "solution" for consumers,
and if that's the best survivability this platform can offer, then
it's high time this platform had it's butt kicked.



>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -
Tech Support: The guys who follow the
'Parade of New Products' with a shovel.
>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

Posted by B. Nice on March 27, 2007, 10:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:56:43 +0200, "cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)"

>>I should of course have used the proper term: Flatten and rebuild.
>
>Same difference. You're rebuilding a duhfault install with duhfault
>settings, no patches, no firewall in < XP SP2, and no updated av.

To me rebuilding also means applying all patches. And yes, applying a
packet filter, a router or a FW device is nescessary before connecting
to the net.

Posted by B. Nice on March 27, 2007, 11:10 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>And yes, applying a packet filter, a router or a FW device is nescessary
>before connecting to the net.

Forgot the best option actually - shutting down the network services
(which should'nt have been on by default).

Similar ThreadsPosted
advice on anti-virus, anti-trojan software May 12, 2008, 7:35 am
HELP: Virus is preventing me from installing anti virus software!! January 11, 2007, 2:17 am
free anti virus software March 13, 2006, 2:01 am
Re: Any Free Anti-Virus software? December 20, 2006, 8:22 am
RE: Any Free Anti-Virus software? December 27, 2006, 3:18 am
Please recommend some anti-virus software November 10, 2008, 12:45 pm
Anti Virus software for Windows 2003 August 13, 2007, 9:57 am
Anti-Virus Software without Internet Connection February 26, 2008, 11:03 am
Free Anti-Virus & Other Safety Software August 13, 2008, 9:20 am
Installing Anti-Virus Software in Safe Mode May 11, 2007, 4:04 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy