|
Posted by kurt wismer on October 26, 2006, 10:32 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Kayman wrote:
> Just one more thing.
>
> It's been suggested by experts never to rely on an on-line virus scanner for
> protection;
> you need to have a full-featured av installed.
> ---
> cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) AKA cquirkenews@nospam.mvps.org
> hinted in a recent message that:
>
> "Once infected, the malware can and often does resist removal, and is
> better-positioned to control the PC than you are to get it back.
> In this situation, the more chance the malware has to get control of
> the system, the less chance you have of getting it back.
>
> Online scanners are the most unsafe in this situation, because by the
> time you've started your infected Windows and connected to the
> Internet via this infected code base, and start to look for scanning
> sites through infected DNS, you are almost certain to have the malware
> perfectly positioned to overrule your attempts to clean it."
>
> So, the way I understand this it is quite okay employing on-line scanners
> for a routine check.
> But they are unsuitable for removing pests.
if they can interfere with removal (which the can) what makes you think
they can't interfere with detection? (hint: they can)
online system scanners are next to useless... online file scanners (like
virustotal) can be useful however...
--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"
|