F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006

F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Antivirus Discussions    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006 Kayman 10-13-2006
Posted by chrisv on October 14, 2006, 9:22 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Kayman wrote:
> Troll - A person who posts messages in order to provoke an
> angry response or to start trouble without adding anything worthwhile
> to the conversation.

Why do you do it then.



Posted by Damian on October 14, 2006, 9:24 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Kayman wrote:
> Troll - A person who posts messages in order to provoke an
> angry response or to start trouble without adding anything worthwhile
> to the conversation.
>

Ahhh... I see by that that you went back and re-read your posts.



Posted by kurt wismer on October 14, 2006, 12:14 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Robert Moir wrote:
> Kayman wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Special Offer for Microsoft Customers: 6 Month Free Trial
>> Subscription for F-Secure Anti-Virus!
>> http://www.f-secure.com/protectyourpc/
>>
>> How does F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006 stand up against, CA's eTrust EZ
>> Antivirus, AntiVir ( free) and AOL's Active Virus Shield?
>>
>> Which application would you employ?
>
> We deploy the corporate version of the F-Secure stuff at work and have been
> very happy. Haven't seen a single infection 'break' on any part of our site
> in a very long time, and as I work for a college where students constantly
> bring in infected disks from home with work on them, that's actually quite
> an accomplishment.

it's not as big an accomplishment as it used to be though, since 'disks'
are hardly ever used as an infection vector anymore and (assuming the
work they have on those disks is word/excel/powerpoint documents) macro
viruses are pretty much on their way out...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"

Posted by Robert Moir on October 14, 2006, 2:29 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
kurt wismer wrote:
>> We deploy the corporate version of the F-Secure stuff at work and
>> have been very happy. Haven't seen a single infection 'break' on any
>> part of our site in a very long time, and as I work for a college
>> where students constantly bring in infected disks from home with
>> work on them, that's actually quite an accomplishment.
>
> it's not as big an accomplishment as it used to be though, since
> 'disks' are hardly ever used as an infection vector anymore and
> (assuming the work they have on those disks is word/excel/powerpoint
> documents) macro viruses are pretty much on their way out...

You're right Kurt, of course. You'd probably still be surprised at how many
people have infected machines at home, judging by what they bring in. Far
less than we all used to see but far more than I expected.



Posted by RH710 on October 14, 2006, 5:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> kurt wismer wrote:
>>> We deploy the corporate version of the F-Secure stuff at work and
>>> have been very happy. Haven't seen a single infection 'break' on any
>>> part of our site in a very long time, and as I work for a college
>>> where students constantly bring in infected disks from home with
>>> work on them, that's actually quite an accomplishment.
>>
>> it's not as big an accomplishment as it used to be though, since
>> 'disks' are hardly ever used as an infection vector anymore and
>> (assuming the work they have on those disks is word/excel/powerpoint
>> documents) macro viruses are pretty much on their way out...
>
> You're right Kurt, of course. You'd probably still be surprised at how
> many people have infected machines at home, judging by what they bring in.
> Far less than we all used to see but far more than I expected.
> I tried F-Secure Internet Security about a month ago.My system was at a
> crawl..I am currently using kaspersky Internet Security and what a world
> of difference.I love it.It is highy rated and regarded very high by the
> guys in here.I don't notice much of a slowdown in speed and the features
> are outstanding.The newest version of KIS is very attractive and user
> friendly also..RH71-
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Protect your PC 2006 :) December 21, 2005, 1:41 pm
NAV 2006 Annoyance #2 March 2, 2006, 7:39 pm
removing NIS 2006 January 18, 2007, 8:37 am
NAV 2006 Annoyance #1 (#2 will follow) March 2, 2006, 7:35 pm
Turning Off the NAV 2006 Scan` March 6, 2006, 10:53 pm
Norton Internet Security 2006 January 7, 2006, 7:38 am
Norton System Works 2006 Help January 22, 2006, 8:57 am
Unable to instal McAfee Security Suite 2006 on ME February 16, 2007, 2:48 pm
best antivirus December 20, 2005, 11:06 am
Modern antivirus for NT3.51? August 28, 2005, 9:14 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy