DNS Randomness Test

DNS Randomness Test

Secure Home | Search | About
 Microsoft Antivirus Discussions    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
DNS Randomness Test Kayman 07-28-2008
Posted by Twayne on July 28, 2008, 11:31 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
f'ups set to msp sec... .virus to save gas, I mean, ether.

> Twayne wrote:
>>> "The test takes a few seconds to complete. When its done you'll see
>>> a page where the transaction ID and source port randomness will be
>>> rated either GREAT, GOOD, or POOR. If you see a POOR rating, we
>>> recommend that contact your ISP and ask if they have plans to
>>> upgrade their nameserver software before August 7th."
> https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/dnsentropy
>>
>> Umm, I'd beware any stranger offering advice in case that appeals to
>> you. It's outright spam to begin with and of no known value or
>> recognition otherwise. It's designed to make you curious and want to
>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if it
>> weren't so stupid!
>>
>>
>>
> I'd also beware of self appointed security experts who do not
> recognize the site www.dns-oarc.net.



None the less, it is spam and as such is subject to all the things spam
is worthy of: nothing. I repeat: "It's designed to make you curious
and want to
>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if it
>> weren't so stupid!"
Spam is spam and you are a spammer.
And speaking of "experts", you seem totally unaware that spam isn't
acceptable, and also that redirections are easy. If you think that URL
is so well known, you have another think coming. It is NOT a recognized
web site for security aspects. In fact:

It's blacklisted at APEWS-L1: (SPEWS replacement)
-----------------------------------------------
http://openrbl.org/client/#www.dns-oarc.net
APEWS_L1 - Anon PM Early Warning System - Level 1
RHS: Spamvertized Domains and alike_
homepagehttp://apews.org/
typeHOST (RHS) Blacklist
zonel1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net [Wiki]
statusBlocklisted at l1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net
-----------------------------------------------
WAS recently listed at SORBS,
----------------------------------------------
and is mired in a long list of AS horizontals and verticals that most
would only use for the purpose of making it difficult to trace them
specifically. Hmm, now who would want that? Oh! I know! Spammers!

lookuphttp://apews.org/?page=test&ip=www.dns-oarc.net
http://www.uceprotect.net/en/apews.html

public.dns-oarc.net

public.dns-oarc.net has one IP record . www.dns-oarc.net point
to the same IP.
network-scanner-230-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net and
network-scanner-224-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net are subdomains
to this hostname.
baserecordnameipreverserouteas
public.dns-oarc.neta149.20.58.8www.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280
project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
dns-oarc.netnshq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.184.186hq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.184.0/21
ns-ext.isc.org204.152.184.64ns-ext.isc.org
ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.19ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.0/24
Internet Software ConsortiumAS2500 WIDE Project in Japan
ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.19ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.0/24
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc., New York, NY, USAAS27319 ISC LGA1
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc , New York, NY, US
ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.19ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.0/24
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.AS8674 NETNOD IX Netnod Internet
Exchange Sverige AB (former D GIX) $Id: aut num:AS8674,v 1 12 2008/07/01
12:56:12 liman Exp $
mxmail.dns-oarc.net149.20.58.4mail.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280
project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
org isc.org net nrt1.isc.org oarc.isc.org sth1.isc.org lga1.isc.org
--------------------------------------

NOW, IDIOT SPAMMER, I gave you a pass on reporting you since it appeared
you might not know what you're doing. But from just 3 minutes worth of
research I can see you not only know what you're doing is spamming, but
you are still spamming even though you're dropped by at one list and
have been noted at around 8 other lists. SORBS may have "dropped" you
but rest assured it won't take a lot to put you back on their list.

If I come across you again on ANY group, forum or other means, rest
assured I will not hassle you, but I WILL report you for spamming, and
I'll resurrect the discussions at nanae for you using your own tripe as
proof!
So either get your ass out of here or be prepared to start looking
for other resources again. It looks like discussions at nanae would be
pretty easy to reopen; it's only been a short period of time.
Don't address me again: I only give one warning.

HTH (you provide the word for the last H)



Posted by David H. Lipman on July 29, 2008, 6:36 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options



| None the less, it is spam and as such is subject to all the things spam
| is worthy of: nothing. I repeat: "It's designed to make you curious
| and want to
>>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if it
>>> weren't so stupid!"
| Spam is spam and you are a spammer.
| And speaking of "experts", you seem totally unaware that spam isn't
| acceptable, and also that redirections are easy. If you think that URL
| is so well known, you have another think coming. It is NOT a recognized
| web site for security aspects. In fact:

< snip >

| NOW, IDIOT SPAMMER, I gave you a pass on reporting you since it appeared

This was NOT spam and I invite Kayman to post other security related information
as he did
in this post!


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



Posted by What's in a Name? on August 1, 2008, 12:15 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wrote:

> >rant snipped<
>
> This was NOT spam and I invite Kayman to post other security related
> information as he did in this post!

*begin rant*

A few years ago I posted a link to the Netcraft Toolbar when it first
came out. I thought some people would find it useful and I was reported
by a certain MVP to my ISP as a spammer. I guess if you find some
security software that is not approved by Microsoft, it doesn't belong
in here. What a joke! They should go after the REAL spammers (like the
one above this thread)

max

P.S. is my sig spam too?

*end rant*
--
Virus Removal http://max.shplink.com/removal.html
Keep Clean http://max.shplink.com/keepingclean.html
Tools http://max.shplink.com/tools.html
Change nomail.afraid.org to gmail.com to reply by email.

Posted by RJK on July 29, 2008, 10:07 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Well, I've always found Kayman's posts helpful, interesting and
eduactional,
...perhaps you should have taken the trouble to have read through some of
them before opening your cake-hole, and ranting on in such a rude,
completely erroneous, and idiotic fashion !

kindest regards !

Richard



> f'ups set to msp sec... .virus to save gas, I mean, ether.
>
>> Twayne wrote:
>>>> "The test takes a few seconds to complete. When its done you'll see
>>>> a page where the transaction ID and source port randomness will be
>>>> rated either GREAT, GOOD, or POOR. If you see a POOR rating, we
>>>> recommend that contact your ISP and ask if they have plans to
>>>> upgrade their nameserver software before August 7th."
>> https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/dnsentropy
>>>
>>> Umm, I'd beware any stranger offering advice in case that appeals to
>>> you. It's outright spam to begin with and of no known value or
>>> recognition otherwise. It's designed to make you curious and want to
>>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if it
>>> weren't so stupid!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'd also beware of self appointed security experts who do not
>> recognize the site www.dns-oarc.net.
>
>
>
> None the less, it is spam and as such is subject to all the things spam is
> worthy of: nothing. I repeat: "It's designed to make you curious and
> want to
>>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if it
>>> weren't so stupid!"
> Spam is spam and you are a spammer.
> And speaking of "experts", you seem totally unaware that spam isn't
> acceptable, and also that redirections are easy. If you think that URL is
> so well known, you have another think coming. It is NOT a recognized web
> site for security aspects. In fact:
>
> It's blacklisted at APEWS-L1: (SPEWS replacement)
> -----------------------------------------------
> http://openrbl.org/client/#www.dns-oarc.net
> APEWS_L1 - Anon PM Early Warning System - Level 1
> RHS: Spamvertized Domains and alike_
> homepagehttp://apews.org/
> typeHOST (RHS) Blacklist
> zonel1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net [Wiki]
> statusBlocklisted at l1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net
> -----------------------------------------------
> WAS recently listed at SORBS,
> ----------------------------------------------
> and is mired in a long list of AS horizontals and verticals that most
> would only use for the purpose of making it difficult to trace them
> specifically. Hmm, now who would want that? Oh! I know! Spammers!
>
> lookuphttp://apews.org/?page=test&ip=www.dns-oarc.net
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/apews.html
>
> public.dns-oarc.net
>
> public.dns-oarc.net has one IP record . www.dns-oarc.net point
> to the same IP. network-scanner-230-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net
> and network-scanner-224-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net are
> subdomains to this hostname.
> baserecordnameipreverserouteas
> public.dns-oarc.neta149.20.58.8www.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280
> project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
>
dns-oarc.netnshq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.184.186hq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.184.0/21
> ns-ext.isc.org204.152.184.64ns-ext.isc.org
> ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.19ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.0/24
> Internet Software ConsortiumAS2500 WIDE Project in Japan
> ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.19ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.0/24
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc., New York, NY, USAAS27319 ISC LGA1
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc , New York, NY, US
> ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.19ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.0/24
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.AS8674 NETNOD IX Netnod Internet Exchange
> Sverige AB (former D GIX) $Id: aut num:AS8674,v 1 12 2008/07/01 12:56:12
> liman Exp $
> mxmail.dns-oarc.net149.20.58.4mail.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280
> project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
> org isc.org net nrt1.isc.org oarc.isc.org sth1.isc.org lga1.isc.org
> --------------------------------------
>
> NOW, IDIOT SPAMMER, I gave you a pass on reporting you since it appeared
> you might not know what you're doing. But from just 3 minutes worth of
> research I can see you not only know what you're doing is spamming, but
> you are still spamming even though you're dropped by at one list and have
> been noted at around 8 other lists. SORBS may have "dropped" you but rest
> assured it won't take a lot to put you back on their list.
>
> If I come across you again on ANY group, forum or other means, rest
> assured I will not hassle you, but I WILL report you for spamming, and
> I'll resurrect the discussions at nanae for you using your own tripe as
> proof!
> So either get your ass out of here or be prepared to start looking for
> other resources again. It looks like discussions at nanae would be pretty
> easy to reopen; it's only been a short period of time.
> Don't address me again: I only give one warning.
>
> HTH (you provide the word for the last H)
>
>



Posted by Peter Foldes on July 29, 2008, 1:09 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
From where did you deduct that this was spam. On the contrary Kayman was =
appreciated and is appreciated for his help and know how. If there was =
spamming it is you if I may so

--=20
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

> f'ups set to msp sec... .virus to save gas, I mean, ether.
>=20
>> Twayne wrote:
>>>> "The test takes a few seconds to complete. When its done you'll see
>>>> a page where the transaction ID and source port randomness will be
>>>> rated either GREAT, GOOD, or POOR. If you see a POOR rating, we
>>>> recommend that contact your ISP and ask if they have plans to
>>>> upgrade their nameserver software before August 7th."
>> https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/dnsentropy
>>>
>>> Umm, I'd beware any stranger offering advice in case that appeals to
>>> you. It's outright spam to begin with and of no known value or
>>> recognition otherwise. It's designed to make you curious and want =
to
>>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if =
it
>>> weren't so stupid!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'd also beware of self appointed security experts who do not
>> recognize the site www.dns-oarc.net.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> None the less, it is spam and as such is subject to all the things =
spam=20
> is worthy of: nothing. I repeat: "It's designed to make you curious=20
> and want to
>>> visit that URL where who knows what might go on? It'd be funny if =
it
>>> weren't so stupid!"
> Spam is spam and you are a spammer.
> And speaking of "experts", you seem totally unaware that spam isn't=20
> acceptable, and also that redirections are easy. If you think that =
URL=20
> is so well known, you have another think coming. It is NOT a =
recognized=20
> web site for security aspects. In fact:
>=20
> It's blacklisted at APEWS-L1: (SPEWS replacement)
> -----------------------------------------------
> http://openrbl.org/client/#www.dns-oarc.net
> APEWS_L1 - Anon PM Early Warning System - Level 1
> RHS: Spamvertized Domains and alike_
> homepagehttp://apews.org/
> typeHOST (RHS) Blacklist
> zonel1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net [Wiki]
> statusBlocklisted at l1.apews.rhsbl.uceprotect.net
> -----------------------------------------------
> WAS recently listed at SORBS,
> ----------------------------------------------
> and is mired in a long list of AS horizontals and verticals that most=20
> would only use for the purpose of making it difficult to trace them=20
> specifically. Hmm, now who would want that? Oh! I know! Spammers!
>=20
> lookuphttp://apews.org/?page=3Dtest&ip=3Dwww.dns-oarc.net
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/apews.html
>=20
> public.dns-oarc.net
>=20
> public.dns-oarc.net has one IP record . www.dns-oarc.net =
point=20
> to the same IP.=20
> network-scanner-230-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net and=20
> network-scanner-224-for-more-info-see.public.dns-oarc.net are =
subdomains=20
> to this hostname.
> baserecordnameipreverserouteas
> public.dns-oarc.neta149.20.58.8www.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280=20
> project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
> =
dns-oarc.netnshq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.184.186hq-ns.oarc.isc.org204.152.=
184.0/21
> ns-ext.isc.org204.152.184.64ns-ext.isc.org
> ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.19ns-ext.nrt1.isc.org192.228.90.0/24=20
> Internet Software ConsortiumAS2500 WIDE Project in Japan
> ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.19ns-ext.lga1.isc.org192.228.91.0/24=20
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc., New York, NY, USAAS27319 ISC LGA1=20
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc , New York, NY, US
> ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.19ns-ext.sth1.isc.org192.228.89.0/24=20
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.AS8674 NETNOD IX Netnod Internet=20
> Exchange Sverige AB (former D GIX) $Id: aut num:AS8674,v 1 12 =
2008/07/01=20
> 12:56:12 liman Exp $
> mxmail.dns-oarc.net149.20.58.4mail.dns-oarc.net149.20.0.0/16 AS1280=20
> project netblockAS1280 ISC AS1280 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc
> org isc.org net nrt1.isc.org oarc.isc.org sth1.isc.org lga1.isc.org
> --------------------------------------
>=20
> NOW, IDIOT SPAMMER, I gave you a pass on reporting you since it =
appeared=20
> you might not know what you're doing. But from just 3 minutes worth =
of=20
> research I can see you not only know what you're doing is spamming, =
but=20
> you are still spamming even though you're dropped by at one list and=20
> have been noted at around 8 other lists. SORBS may have "dropped" you =

> but rest assured it won't take a lot to put you back on their list.
>=20
> If I come across you again on ANY group, forum or other means, rest=20
> assured I will not hassle you, but I WILL report you for spamming, and =

> I'll resurrect the discussions at nanae for you using your own tripe =
as=20
> proof!
> So either get your ass out of here or be prepared to start looking=20
> for other resources again. It looks like discussions at nanae would =
be=20
> pretty easy to reopen; it's only been a short period of time.
> Don't address me again: I only give one warning.
>=20
> HTH (you provide the word for the last H)
>=20
>

Similar ThreadsPosted
only test- solo test March 5, 2006, 6:41 am
Re: test only August 26, 2006, 9:56 am
ONLY A TEST! November 18, 2007, 10:55 am
Re: Trial/Test March 19, 2006, 10:01 pm
A new 'Beta' test from Panda July 26, 2007, 5:03 pm
Anti-Malware Test April 15, 2008, 8:22 pm
tools to test server Security September 24, 2005, 10:27 pm
Test to see if my posts show up in my reader. October 16, 2008, 3:26 pm
Re: Do you ever test VISTA i have found lots of problems ?! March 24, 2006, 10:45 am
RE: Do you ever test VISTA i have found lots of problems ?! March 24, 2006, 11:40 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy