|
Posted by on February 22, 2007, 1:55 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > one-o wrote:
> >> One-o wrote:
>
> >>> I use Winzip Pro 10.0.6698 and create standard archives with a ZIP
> >>> file extension which I send as an email attachment. I do not
> >>> create self- extracting EXE files as many company firewalls block
> >>> EXEs attached to emails.
>
>
> >> Of course, in terms of encryption this would be utterly stupid.
>
> > Please explain what you mean.
>
> Presume an attacker which has the capability to change the file. He
> attaches his own payload, which captures the password, unpacks the content
> and modifies the target system to report this file without the payload,
> then sends ou the captures password.
>
> >>> For sensitive data, I use either 128-bit AES or 256-bit AES
> >>> encryption in Winzip.
>
> >> Nah, can't be that sensitive.
>
> > Actually it is.
>
> No, it isn't, because the implementation in WinZip is well-known to be
> broken. Thus, you might leak some data.
>
Actually according to NIST WinZip's AES implementation is FIPS 192
certified:
http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/aes/aesval.html
|