Port scan from grc.com fails 1st time passes the 2nd?

Port scan from grc.com fails 1st time passes the 2nd?

Secure Home | Search | About

Networking Firewalls - Software and hardware firewalls discussions 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Port scan from grc.com fails 1st time passes the 2nd? Paul H 03-11-2005
Posted by Paul H on March 11, 2005, 3:46 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
We have a NAT router with SPI protecting our small LAN.

When I go to http://grc.com and run the shields up scan on common ports, it
shows the following ports as open; 21, 23 and 80. If I run the scan again
afew seconds later all ports show a stealthed. If I leave it for a few
minutes and run the scan again the ports are open again.

OK so the firewall is "reacting" to an intrusion attempt, but wouldn't it be
better to be closed or stealthed the FIRST time an intrusion was attempted?
Can anyone comment on this routers behaviour? I have never seen a router do
this before, is it a potential risk, or is it being "smart"?

Thanks

Paul




Posted by Renegade on March 11, 2005, 4:41 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:46:05 +0000, Paul H wrote:

> We have a NAT router with SPI protecting our small LAN.
>
> When I go to http://grc.com and run the shields up scan on common ports, it
> shows the following ports as open; 21, 23 and 80. If I run the scan again
> afew seconds later all ports show a stealthed. If I leave it for a few
> minutes and run the scan again the ports are open again.
>
> OK so the firewall is "reacting" to an intrusion attempt, but wouldn't it be
> better to be closed or stealthed the FIRST time an intrusion was attempted?
> Can anyone comment on this routers behaviour? I have never seen a router do
> this before, is it a potential risk, or is it being "smart"?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul

Do you have any services that need those ports? If so, then the router
is reacting to what it thinks is an intrusion by dropping requests to
those ports.


Posted by Duane Arnold on March 11, 2005, 5:46 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> We have a NAT router with SPI protecting our small LAN.
>
> When I go to http://grc.com and run the shields up scan on common
> ports, it shows the following ports as open; 21, 23 and 80. If I run
> the scan again afew seconds later all ports show a stealthed. If I
> leave it for a few minutes and run the scan again the ports are open
> again.
>
> OK so the firewall is "reacting" to an intrusion attempt, but wouldn't
> it be better to be closed or stealthed the FIRST time an intrusion was
> attempted? Can anyone comment on this routers behaviour? I have never
> seen a router do this before, is it a potential risk, or is it being
> "smart"?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
>

What router are you talking about? Stealth means nothing to the router. The
machine or machines are *stealth* because they are behind the router. The
ports on the router are *closed* by default. The only way they are open is
due do a machine running a program and the program is making a solicitation
to a remote IP causing the port(s) to *ONLY* (especially true with SPI) be
open to that traffic. Or you have configured the router by doing port
forwarding to open and (leave open) to the public Internet specified
inbound ports for a specific program to listen on those port(s).

You should seek out some other testing sites and not depend solely on the
Gibson site to tell you what's happening with the ports.

And if the NAT router is like most NAT routers, then it's likely a NAT (no
true firewall) router with FW like features.

Duane :)


Similar ThreadsPosted
change NIC, port forward fails February 23, 2006, 12:26 am
Port scan activty January 11, 2006, 2:35 am
Port scan by DNS normal? March 19, 2007, 4:16 pm
Sonicwall "possible port scan" Help! May 21, 2007, 10:31 am
UPD Port Scan from DNS Server Happening, What's Up? January 15, 2006, 2:30 pm
Frequnt port scan attacks October 15, 2007, 9:42 am
Utility to check for ports the firewall blocks or passes through June 17, 2006, 3:55 pm
Re: Losing part of the Internet-connection, from time to time. August 11, 2008, 5:49 pm
Re: Losing part of the Internet-connection, from time to time. August 12, 2008, 6:43 pm
iptables -j QUEUE fails on RH-E-WS-4 May 10, 2005, 9:55 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy