|
Posted by Duane Arnold on February 12, 2006, 12:52 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Brian wrote:
> Hi,
> I ran Spyware Doctor 3.5 and it says I had the Lazar.c trojan in a registry
> item that had a Panda TruPrevent item. Spyware Doctor then removed it but it
> came back.
>
> I uninstalled via the Control pannel Panda TruPrevent (also manually removed
> the remainents of the program folder). Then reran Spyware Doctor. Got a
> clean slate. Next I downloaded and reinstalled Panda TruPrevent 2006 and ran
> Spyware Doctor. It found I was re-infected. Uninstalled as above with clean
> results from Spyware Doctor.
> Panda TruPrevent says it does not use viral signatures but detects via
> behavior. How then is SD giving me this result. Is it a false positive.
> Panda has not responded to my e-mail. My system is a Dell 2.3GHZ Pentium
> Windows XP Prof. Note this whole thing started with SD finding Panda
> Trupevent 2005 infected. So I downloaded the new "Improved" version. You
> would think I should get a Lazar.D Trojan upgrade from the Lazar.C Trojan.
> :) But no the new 2006 seems to have the same one?? Is this a false reading
> from SD?
>
> Brian Dawson
>
You're getting a false positive or something. Do you actually think that
Panda is going to have some kind of exploit implanted in its solution?
Maybe, a more appropriate NG like an AV NG can answer your questions ke
alt.comp.anti-virus.
Duane :)
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map