|
Posted by Doug McIntyre on October 8, 2006, 11:36 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>Would someone who has used both do a comparison of the two. Reading
>the description of Active Directory Microsoft authors boast that it is
>rated "AAA" level of security, but looking back over time we see that
>NT failed to quality for even C levels of Security, and the sources I
>have read say that Active Directory came out of MS 2000, which
>logically wouldn't have jumped light years ahead of NT.
>I have researched these two directory services but would love to know
>more from those who have used both of them in a hetrogenius
>environment. It seems to me at this point that LDAP is the preferred
>choice, but I'm open to hearing others opinions. Any opinions on
>directory services that surpass both, or will surpass both would be of
>interest as well.
Would it blow your mind to learn that Active Directory has a major piece
of it that is LDAP? But that is only one part of many.
So, the two are doing different tasks and jobs. Can't really compare
the two in an objective measure in this generic level of question.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map