|
Posted by samantha on June 9, 2007, 2:51 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Remove the samples you'll find if you look around.
>
>> [snip]
>>> Viruses are product and OS specific and don't justify credible
>>> academic study,
>>
>> tell that to fred cohen...
>
> Virus Guy is mostly right there, though he somewhat overstated
> the case that there is nothing of academic worth in studying
> computer virus, or more generally malware, related issues.
>
> That said however, note the dearth of _significant_ virus or
> malware related PhD theses presented since Fred's. When it
> comes to the theoretically significant aspects of computer
> viruses, Fred pretty wrote the book and put the _academic_
> field to bed all in one move.
>
> Of course, various "populists" have come along since, offering
> various courses of questionable academic and/or pedagogical
> value, but which I'm sure have produced nice economic returns
> to their hosting institutions because of the "sexiness" of
> (superficially) studying hot-button topics. However, such
> economic "success" does not make those studies worthwhile. If
> you need to spend more than a few minutes of your entire life
> pondering the theoretical, academic and practical significance
> of "runs arbitrary code on the target computer", then CS is
> clearly the wrong field for you...
>
>
> --
> Nick FitzGerald
>
|