|
Posted by William on January 1, 2007, 4:05 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options on 31 Dec 2006, something possessed Saqib Ali to write:
> With FDE, the encryption is not a off-line process. Every bit is
> encrypted at the Kernel or Hardware level as it is written to the HDD
> platter. Think of it as a stream cipher. So there is no compression or
> decompression involved......
>
> saqib
> http://www.full-disk-encryption.net
>
>
>
> Rick Merrill wrote:
>> Saqib Ali wrote:
>> > To address the issue of data leaks from stolen or missing laptops,
>> > US Government is planning to use Full Disk Encryption (FDE) on all
>> > of the Government owned computers. On June 23, 2006 a Presidential
>> > Mandate was put in place requiring all agency laptops to fully
>> > encrypt data on the HDD. The US Government is currently conducting
>> > the largest single side-by-side comparison and competition for the
>> > selection of a Full Disk Encryption product. This implementation
>> > will end up being the largest single implementation ever, and all
>> > of the information regarding the competition is in the public
>> > domain. The selected product will be deployed on Millions of
>> > computers in the US federal government space. The evaluation will
>> > come to a end in 90 days.
>> >
>> > ...... Read complete article at:
>> > http://www.full-disk-encryption.net/fde_govt.html
>> >
>>
>> I would assume that the encryption would also accompany compression.
>> It takes about as many cycles to decompress as it does to decrypt?
>
>
Does this full-disk encryption protect against most trojan-downloader
users, though? I mean, if some program like Back Orifice got onto the
machine, then couldn't the remote cracker get access to the data, even
though the entire disk is encrypted, via whatever host-kernal's
encryption/decryption mechanism?
|