Should Linux wipe memory more often for better security?

Should Linux wipe memory more often for better security?

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Should Linux wipe memory more often for better security? plenty900 02-25-2008
Posted by Jeff Makey on February 29, 2008, 2:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>It's not the operating system's
>responsibility to decide, which parts of the memory contain sensitive
>data.

On the other hand, mandatory access controls such as those provided by
SELinux at least provide a framework that could allow the OS to know
the relative sensitivities of data in RAM. Preserving the MAC label
of freed-but-not-erased RAM would assure that the information is
available to prioritize an emergency memory wipe.

:: Jeff Makey
jeff@sdsc.edu

Department of Tautological Pleonasms and Superfluous Redundancies Department

Similar ThreadsPosted
security software for linux and mac July 4, 2007, 1:43 pm
cp fw-1 ngx: no memory for german umlaute January 15, 2006, 5:15 am
Different tools for the same memory capture January 4, 2009, 12:26 pm
Re: Microsoft Internet Explorer COM Object Instantiation Memory Corruption Vulnerability December 15, 2005, 10:03 am
Wipe Outlook Mail Messages January 22, 2006, 12:41 pm
DoD Harddrive Secure Erase Wipe April 2, 2008, 9:37 pm
Software to wipe disk drives on servers and pc January 30, 2008, 4:11 pm
Linux Help September 27, 2006, 7:23 pm
Linux? Which one is the most friendly? May 1, 2005, 3:37 pm
end of linux-nightmares... approachable June 17, 2005, 11:27 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy