Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare

Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remaile 02-17-2008
Posted by Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remaile on February 17, 2008, 1:35 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Kristian Gj=C3=B8steen wrote:

> >Embarrassing incompetent gits with over inflated egos
> >is a hobby of mine.
>=20
> Is that what you are doing? I can see "embarrasing", "incompetent git"
> and "inflated ego", but not quite in this combination.

Your dyslexia isn't my problem.

>=20
> >We'll start with why the most notable member of Counterpane advises
> >people to use Rijndael rather then their own product.
>=20
> Bruce Schneier a _member_ of Counterpane? Twofish a _product_ of
> Counterpane?

Neither is your pathetic attempts to start semantics quibbles.

So did you have anything useful to add, or were you just wanting
to foam?



Similar ThreadsPosted
TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare February 14, 2008, 4:48 pm
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare February 17, 2008, 11:30 am
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare February 17, 2008, 4:00 pm
Re: TrueCrypt 5.0a - Non KakaWare February 16, 2008, 10:50 am
Truecrypt 6 hates pagefiles? July 8, 2008, 4:03 pm
Truecrypt supposed to be insecure. Authors fled November 21, 2005, 8:00 am

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy