|
Posted by Lefty on August 30, 2006, 1:08 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> someone@sbcglobal.net says...
>>
>> > someone@sbcglobal.net says...
>> >>
>> >> > lunch@nofreelunch.us says...
>> >> >> >> >Sorry for following my own post, but I found a link in a
>> >> >> >> >source
>> >> >> >> >you
>> >> >> >> >might find reputable:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1376213,00.html
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Just read how she screwed all of us on Taxes, Social
>> >> >> >> >Security,
>> >> >> >> >she's
>> >> >> >> >managed to get the majority of the left working against
>> >> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >> >people.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thank you for providing a source that shows that you are a
>> >> >> >> liar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Thanks you for providing proof that you can't comprehend
>> >> >> >what
>> >> >> >you
>> >> >> >read.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You wish.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You made the claim. It was false.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you can't understand what you read, then I can see how you
>> >> > would
>> >> > think it was false, but all you need to do is search for her
>> >> > interview
>> >> > text on the net and you will be back saying I was right.
>> >>
>> >> This from the fellow who proclaims he's amenable to persuasion
>> >> by
>> >> fact.
>> >> Suppose you show us the exact quote you have in mind when you
>> >> say
>> >> Pelosi and the Democratic Party are working against the US?
>> >> You're going to be called on this, so pony up.
>> >
>> > You can read it yourself, just try, and if you can't see how they
>> > are
>> > working against the PEOPLE instead of FOR the PEOPLE, then you
>> > don't
>> > need anything else from me.
>>
>> Before that whiff I thought you were sincere.
>> Now you're just another dishonest partisan loser.
>> I have read it.
>> I agree with Pelosi pretty much right down the line, and her
>> policies
>> seem to me much more rational, humane and disposed to success than
>> anything the present administration has ever done.
>> Since you can't put your finger on what's wrong with her ideas, I
>> feel
>> altogether vindicated in those views. After all, no-one opposes
>> them
>> on rational grounds.
>
> I already stated what I thought was wrong with her ideals and what
> she's
> done do block productive work for the people. All you have to do is
> go
> back and look at what I posted. If you can't read what was posted
> I'm
> not going back and look it up for you, so you can claim you win by
> ignorance.
That is simply untrue.
You have never posted anything but vacuous partisan blather, and
pretentious arguments against established fact.
The worst of it is positing anecdotes against official government
statistics, but that isn't the stupidest thing you've done. That
would be your claim that "surplus" doesn't mean what ALL economists
and political scientists agree it means.
As for your whiny claims to intelligence and open-mindedness, they are
just laughable. No-one rational would make sweeping generalities from
anecdote and reflex.
>
> --
>
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me
| 
XML site map