|
Posted by gurkatoon on January 2, 2007, 7:21 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Does anybody know about a proxy that stands between your compputer and
> the internet? It seems like there was a discussion like this a while
> back and somebody mentioned you can download a "proxy" program that
> controls all information passing into your computer via the web. There
> was a link to a site for a proxy server, and a dedication to the
> author, who has passed away. Wish I could remember the site or find
> that old thread....
>
Try not to crosspost, it's lame.
Searching in Google for proxy + "passed away" + "filter ads"
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=proxy+%22passed+away%22+%22filter+ads%22
Found startup reference.
OK.
Sooo, Proxomitron is what you are looking for.
Look in CastleCops forums.
It will not hurt you if you do try to use Google's search engine.
No pun intended.
best wishes,
gurkatoon
|
|
Posted by Leythos on January 2, 2007, 8:02 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
says...
> Try not to crosspost, it's lame.
Crossposting to the relevant groups, limited to 5 or less, IS the proper
way to post to multiple groups. Multiposting the same article to
multiple groups is lame, as it prevents proper followups, prevents
proper marking of READ for all posted groups...
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
|
|
Posted by gurkatoon on January 5, 2007, 12:58 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > Crossposting to the relevant groups, limited to 5 or less, IS the proper
> way to post to multiple groups. Multiposting the same article to
> multiple groups is lame, as it prevents proper followups, prevents
> proper marking of READ for all posted groups...
Well, yes, but...
The OP crossposted to several newsgroups, with some of them beeing
"proprietary", that is, not widely available. So, I still do think THAT is
lame.
best wishes,
gurkatoon
|
|
Posted by Frank Slootweg on January 6, 2007, 5:28 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > > Crossposting to the relevant groups, limited to 5 or less, IS the proper
> > way to post to multiple groups. Multiposting the same article to
> > multiple groups is lame, as it prevents proper followups, prevents
> > proper marking of READ for all posted groups...
>
> Well, yes, but...
> The OP crossposted to several newsgroups, with some of them beeing
> "proprietary", that is, not widely available. So, I still do think THAT is
> lame.
It is irrelevant if some of the groups are "proprietary" or/and "not
widely available" as long as nobody removes any of them from their
response. Since you *did* delete them, *you* are being "lame", because
you are preventing your response from getting to the original audience.
Not only is it lame, but it's also rather silly, because you have no
way of knowing if the parent/original poster will see your response.
I am apparently subscribed to this group, but to which of the original
groups [1] is the OP subscribed? Answer: You have no way of knowing. And
a quick search shows that he is *probably* *not* subscribed to this
group and hence will probably not see your response(s).
So might I suggest to learn how things actually work, instead of using
the L-word so often?
[1] > Newsgroups:
mozilla.support.firefox,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,comp.security.misc,24hoursupport.helpdesk
|
|
Posted by gurkatoon on January 7, 2007, 12:40 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > It is irrelevant if some of the groups are "proprietary" or/and "not
> widely available" as long as nobody removes any of them from their
> response. Since you *did* delete them, *you* are being "lame", because
> you are preventing your response from getting to the original audience.
>
> Not only is it lame, but it's also rather silly, because you have no
> way of knowing if the parent/original poster will see your response.
>
> I am apparently subscribed to this group, but to which of the original
> groups [1] is the OP subscribed? Answer: You have no way of knowing. And
> a quick search shows that he is *probably* *not* subscribed to this
> group and hence will probably not see your response(s).
>
> So might I suggest to learn how things actually work, instead of using
> the L-word so often?
>
> [1] > Newsgroups:
>
mozilla.support.firefox,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,comp.security.misc,24hoursupport.helpdesk
Yes, we agree to disagree.
best wishes,
gurkatoon
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Know about a proxy server? | January 2, 2007, 1:15 pm |
| Default home page for those without proxy server settings | October 25, 2005, 12:03 am |
| Proxy | June 15, 2005, 1:31 am |
| Hiding ip with proxy | June 29, 2005, 7:35 am |
| Palm with anonymous proxy | December 21, 2004, 10:30 pm |
| Auto Proxy Login?? Please help | March 14, 2005, 4:39 am |
| Proxy sign messages | July 26, 2005, 12:58 pm |
| Website still sees my IP while using proxy | September 23, 2005, 8:48 am |
| https / proxy problem | January 11, 2006, 10:59 am |
| SSL Proxy / How to forward HTTPS connections? | August 12, 2005, 6:29 am |
|
XML site map