Re: HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs?

Re: HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs?

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Re: HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs? asrbktkd 12-22-2007
Posted by asrbktkd on December 22, 2007, 3:31 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

I have searched for the weigand kit. I can't find it anywhere on the
Internet. I would like to purchase one. Anyone have a link?

Roland Moore;44621 Wrote:
> There is no decoded and undecoded outputs in the HID Proximity format
> you
> mention. At its simplest the prox card has a chip inside it creating a
> pulse
> output. There are many physical forms of "active cards" and "passive
> cards"
> and fobs and "lick and sticks" etc. The unique card number is
> programmed
> into the chip inside the card. The HID Proximity format has become an
> industry standard so many manufacturers use it since the HID patent
> expired.
> So the chip inside the card creates the same type output as the
> original
> Wiegand pulse-generating cards that used bits of wire inside the card
> and no
> chips. So that's it. It is a pulse. The "pulse" can be different
> lengths.
> There is the standard 26 bit format, meaning a "pulse" of 26 pieces or
> bits
> of on or off data. In that output format you have the card number, the
> facility code or site code etc. (because the nomeclature varies a lot).
> To
> make it more interesting one can vary the location of the start bit
> location
> and scramble things up a little. Different access control
> manufactureres
> have their own formats. Continental Instrumants 36 bit, Card Key 35
> bit,
> Infographic Systems 34 bit, CEM 33 bits etc. Therefore what is printed
> on
> the card may be the actual card number output or something else not at
> all
> related to the card number in any way. When you get the cards from the
> manufacturer there is a sheet that cross references what is printed on
> the
> card versus the actual output.
> You can certainly defeat the security of a card access system by using
> a
> device like the one you saw on TV. You don't even have to be cleaver
> enough
> to build your own device, you can buy it complete and ready to use
> right off
> of the Internet and start spoofing.
> I don't think that one would install simple weigand cards on a
> facility
> where high security was a concern. There are other technologies
> besides
> weigand. One step up would be to use the Indala reader. Indala is now a
> part
> of HID. You get a more unique communications going between the card and
> the
> reader that makes it a bit more difficult to spoof.
> HID is not stupid. They do make cards that you can't easily spoof and
> formats that are unique. The HID iCLASS format, combined with an Elite
> class
> reader and Corporate 1000 format would pretty much rule out spoofing
> or
> duplication completely. The iCLASS would mean what the spoofer read
> would
> not work when "played back" to the reader. It is unique evey time (well
> the
> challenge repeats every 1.5 million years or some ridiculously long
> time)
> because there is a two way communication going. The Elite ties the
> reader
> and the card together so even another iCLASS card won't be acknoledged.
> And
> the Corporate 1000 means HID will never produce another card with that
> number on it so there are no duplicates ever produced by HID.
> Does it worry anyone in the industry that Weigand Prox format cards can
> be
> spoofed? I don't know. If you put a reader on a glass door and have a
> strike on a door lock I think not. A prox card is not like a door key
> that
> works 24/7/365. For the most part a card is programmed to work normal
> business hours on a limited set of doors. Even if you spoofed a card
> and
> antipassback was in play you couldn't just spoof a card of a random
> person
> passing by and then walk in. In most cases the bad guy wanting in will
> pick
> up a rock and smash out the glass. If the bad guy is a bit more
> resourceful
> or skilled he will pick or pry the lock. I have never been made aware
> of a
> successful (or unsuccessful) spoof attack in real life. If I do I'll
> try and
> post the video clip of the guy here because I am sure there will be
> one.
> There are almost always other sorts of security measures to have to
> get
> around like cameras, or in the reader itself, like PIN numbers,
> biometric
> interfaces, face matching, etc. Remember we're only talking about
> Weigand
> Prox formats. There are other formats like MiFare, RFID etc. I think
> the
> career of a Weigand Prox format spoofer would be very short. But don't
> let
> me disabuse anyone here from a career choice. I know some guys that
> work
> with prison ministries and they hear from the inmates that the food is
> good
> and the sex is great.
>
> > Can someone explain the difference between an HID proximity card's
> decoded
> > and undecoded outputs? My guess is that number printed on the card
> is
> > an
> > undecoded output, and it's just there to make it easier for humans to
> type
> > in a number to a software application. Probably the real number is
> on
> > the
> > card as is longer or more complex format? How many digits are
> there and
> > in what format (e.g., alphanumeric only).
> >
> > I saw a demo on TV recently of some guy who using a home made
> circuit
> > board
> > was able to swipe any person in his vicinity's prox cards, then
> record
> > that
> > and play it back to get access through any prox reader. Pretty
> scary
> > stuff, and it's obviously not a very secure architecture if they are
> > sending
> > out numbers in a way that doesn't use some kind of private and public
> key
> > exchange.
> >
> > We are thinking of using the proximity cards as part of a two factor
> > authentication system to login to computers, which is why I would
> like to
> > understand the length and structure of the number on the card. We
> would
> > be
> > using PCPROX readers.
> >
> > --
> > Will
> >
> >


------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.wirelessforums.org/showthread.php?t=7501
http://www.wirelessforums.org


Similar ThreadsPosted
HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs? September 29, 2006, 4:36 pm
PCI-X cards for windows xp May 4, 2005, 5:57 pm
New to smart cards need help September 12, 2005, 4:53 pm
Need help on Java cards October 3, 2005, 10:14 am
Phishing versus phlishing May 8, 2007, 5:47 am
password versus pin in application authentication May 29, 2006, 8:38 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy