|
|
|
|
|
Posted by Rob Slade, doting grandpa of R on August 29, 2005, 9:44 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
BKSPMKNG.RVW 20050610
"Spam Kings", Brian McWilliams, 2005, 0-596-00732-9, U$22.95/C$33.95
%A Brian McWilliams
%C 103 Morris Street, Suite A, Sebastopol, CA 95472
%D 2005
%G 0-596-00732-9
%I O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
%O U$22.95/C$33.95 707-829-0515 fax: 707-829-0104 nuts@ora.com
%O http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596007329/robsladesinterne http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596007329/robsladesinte-21 %O http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596007329/robsladesin03-20 %O Audience n+ Tech 1 Writing 2 (see revfaq.htm for explanation)
%P 333 p.
%T "Spam Kings"
This book is the story of some spammers, and some anti-spammers,
during the period from about 1998 to 2003. The stories are not, as in
other works, separated by chapters, but are interwoven in roughly
chronological order.
After a while, you begin to realize that much of the material is
padded out with conversations taken from old Usenet archives, as well
as instant messaging and IRC (Internet Relay Chat) logs. Oddly
enough, these aren't as interesting as they sound. The conversations
aren't particularly illuminating, and tend to be arguments on the
level of schoolyard fights. In fact, almost nobody in the book comes
across as an attractive or sympathetic character: even the "good guys"
seem to be self-righteous, petty, vindictive, and occasionally just
plain, outright nasty.
The book does not provide much insight into spam protection
technology: that is probably not the intent. Neither does it describe
spamming technology as such, and many would likely consider this
restraint to be a good thing. Instead, the book concentrates on the
fight between the spamming and anti-spamming forces, but does not go
into any detail on those technologies either, using narratives, and
references to the fact that certain research is undertaken, without
any suggestion of how this might be accomplished.
Those seriously interested in the fight against spam will likely find
something in this work to redeem the cost of it. Those who simply
want to use email, and who are annoyed by spam, may believe that they
have obtained some insight into the phenomenon after reading the text.
But it's difficult to say what value or intelligence that might be.
copyright Robert M. Slade, 2005 BKSPMKNG.RVW 20050610
--
======================
rslade@vcn.bc.ca slade@victoria.tc.ca rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu
============= for back issues:
[Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/ or mirror http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade/ CISSP refs: [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm
Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm
Book reviews: [Base URL]mnbk.htm
Review mailing list: send mail to techbooks-subscribe@egroups.com
or techbooks-subscribe@topica.com
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | REVIEW: "File System Forensic Analysis", Brian Carrier | August 8, 2005, 2:51 pm |
| Give up Spam for Lent - New Email System Simply Defeats Spam | February 9, 2005, 7:41 pm |
| REVIEW: "Spies Among Us", Ira Winkler | June 22, 2005, 3:16 pm |
| REVIEW: "Darknet", J. D. Lasica | July 25, 2005, 2:50 pm |
| REVIEW: "Always Use Protection", Dan Appleman | December 14, 2005, 1:58 pm |
| REVIEW: "CISSP Exam Notes", K. Wan | May 19, 2005, 11:00 pm |
| REVIEW: "Reversing", Eldad Eilam | July 4, 2005, 2:59 pm |
| Cisa Review Manual 2007 | January 5, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| REVIEW: "Brute Force", Matt Curtin | June 16, 2005, 10:49 pm |
| REVIEW: "Silence on the Wire", Michal Zalewski | June 27, 2005, 3:18 pm |
|
|
|