|
Posted by on May 8, 2007, 5:47 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello,
I've just come across the term "phlishing" whilst reading about
security issues. From what I can gather it's used in the same context
of "phishing", which I understand. Are there any differences? Is
phlishing more specific? Any light on the matter would be great.
Many thanks,
Jo
|
|
Posted by on May 8, 2007, 6:46 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On May 8, 10:47 am, midnigh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just come across the term "phlishing" whilst reading about
> security issues. From what I can gather it's used in the same context
> of "phishing", which I understand. Are there any differences? Is
> phlishing more specific? Any light on the matter would be great.
>
> Many thanks,
> Jo
Looks like a typo to me...
MT
|
|
Posted by macarro on May 9, 2007, 11:19 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> Looks like a typo to me...
>
> MT
>
I would agree with that, I have heard of pharming but not phlishing.
--
Customized News: http://news.spotback.com
|
|
Posted by on May 11, 2007, 9:45 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options > > Looks like a typo to me...
>
> > MT
>
> I would agree with that, I have heard of pharming but not phlishing.
>
> --
>
> Customized News:http://news.spotback.com
Hi,
Thanks for the replies. First thoughts I had were that it was a typo.
A colleague did find this though, which was a slightly different
spelling:
http://www.mac-net.com/243480.page
Ta,
Jo
|
|
Posted by Barry Margolin on May 11, 2007, 9:42 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> > > Looks like a typo to me...
> >
> > > MT
> >
> > I would agree with that, I have heard of pharming but not phlishing.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Customized News:http://news.spotback.com
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the replies. First thoughts I had were that it was a typo.
> A colleague did find this though, which was a slightly different
> spelling:
>
> http://www.mac-net.com/243480.page
That article is 3 years old. If the word hasn't caught on yet, I doubt
it will.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | password versus pin in application authentication | May 29, 2006, 8:38 pm |
| Re: HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs? | December 22, 2007, 3:31 pm |
| HID Proximity Cards: Decoded Versus Undecoded Outputs? | September 29, 2006, 4:36 pm |
| phishing with google ? | September 25, 2006, 2:38 am |
| Very organized phishing, DNS | October 19, 2006, 10:39 pm |
| Phishing for Godaddy Password. | May 5, 2005, 10:16 pm |
| And just when we thought the IRS Phishing Scams were over ........ | July 1, 2006, 12:33 pm |
| "New Universal Man-in-the-Middle Phishing Kit" ? | January 17, 2007, 6:58 am |
| How to understand this "phishing" mail? | March 15, 2007, 8:45 pm |
| Yahoo mail -- Virus? Phishing? | December 16, 2004, 9:49 pm |
|
XML site map