|
Posted by Leythos on August 7, 2006, 11:55 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
b__nice@hotmail.com says...
>
> >Nothing has changed, and I have clearly not said, not anywhere, that
> >VB's code is malware. I do not believe it is malware. My stating that
> >it's not malware doesn't mean, if it acts like malware, that it should
> >not be detected as malware.
>
> Okay. One final attempt then:
>
> "POC code does not fit the definition of malware"
> which means
> "POC code is not malware"
> which leads to
> "POC code should not be detected as malware"
>
> Please state precisely where and why I am wrong.
POC code can be anything or do anything - being a POC doesn't make it
any different than any other code.
POC code performs malware like functions.
POC code appears to have NOT been submitted to antivirus vendors for
white listing or exclusion - nothing to indicate it had been submitted
before it was released.
POC code intent can not be determined by antivirus software as AV
software has no emotional connection to author.
Do you understand now?
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
| 
