|
Posted by imhotep on June 8, 2006, 6:46 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
>
>> Funny how the infamous EULA does not specify this? Isn't it?
>>
>> "Microsoft Corp. acknowledged Wednesday that it needs to better inform
>> users
> . . .
>
> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/08/0119253&from=rss
>
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060607/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_monitoring_piracy;_ylt=AujEpciXDaznfIp7roidcYMjtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTA0cDJlYmhvBHNlYwM>
> -- Imhotep>All the same, more people should read their EULA.txt
> agreement.I recall some universities that deeply deliberated over the
> internetservicing related clauses when they first appeared with XP . .
> .--ra
True. Microsoft get's away with alot of stuff be cause most people do not
read that stupid thing....
anyway...
Imhotep
|