How to tell a fake SSL certificate from a real one

How to tell a fake SSL certificate from a real one
Secure Home | Search | About
Login Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
How to tell a fake SSL certificate from a real one Joan Battaglia 10-27-2007
Posted by Anonymous Sender on October 28, 2007, 8:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Ari wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:49:20 -0500, Anonymous Sender wrote:
>
> >>>> Now I will take the time to read them.
> >>>
> >>> Good Luck.
> >>
> >> It's really pretty simple. If you get an error that you didn't expect
> >> or one that can't be easily explained by things like the Linksys
> >> router issue or periodic rotation of expired SSL certificates, then you
> >> don't accept them. Period. Unless you know for sure that the reason for
> >> the error has a verifiable and natural cause, you click 'NO', 'CANCEL',
> >> or whatever negative response your software offers you. If you're in
> >> doubt as to what to click, close the software all together.
> >>
> >> If you've made a mistake and the connection was actually kosher then no
> >> harm done. You have ample time to sort it out and make a final
> >> determination about a given certificate. OTOH, if you err on the side
> >> opposite of caution you may have precious few minutes to sort it out
> >> before some script kiddie cleans out your bank account by wire
> >> transferring your entire balance to Taiwan. :(
> >
> >> I have never insulted you to the best of my belief and knowledge.
> >
> > ROTFLMAO!
> >
> > That's the biggest load of shit you've EVER posted.
>
> Except that I didn't post it, A$$hole. lol

Nobody said you did, "asshole".

So why would you "defend" yourself from something that you were never
even involved in? Freudian slip, or just some childish little game?

Either way you're an obnoxious cretin.




















Posted by Ari on October 29, 2007, 2:20 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
*On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:*

>> I have never insulted you to the best of my belief and knowledge.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:

> > > ROTFLMAO!
> > >
> > > That's the biggest load of shit you've EVER posted.

*ARI:*

> > Except that I didn't post it, A$$hole. lol

* Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:*

> Nobody said you did, "asshole".

lol

See what remailers do to you? Match that with this absurd, combative,
over-inflated valuation of yourself (" I have to be Anonymous, I am
sooooooo important") which flies directly in the face of "I will risk all I
am important about to play like a child on Usenet 7/24/366" combined w/ "I
have to uphold my Usenet reputation" shtick you are on. You can't keep up
with your own allegations.

You want to argue with me? When you can't keep up with your own postings?
Or be consistent between feeding your fucking ego and exposing yourself ("I
am Anonymous b/c I am laden with great tasks" v.s. "The Boss will kick my
ass to the curb")

You're a walking paradox of total bullshit. And a coward to boot.

Fuck off. If I want to banter with kids, techie wannabees, or dark corner
hiding flashers, I'll go to the nearest kindergarten, Star Trek
Extravaganza or urban alley where dogs piss.

See ya'.

Posted by Anonymous Sender on October 29, 2007, 4:00 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Ari wrote:

<FLUSH!>

Your middle initial wouldn't be an 'S' by any chance would it?


Posted by Anonymous on October 29, 2007, 4:19 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Ari wrote:

> > > Except that I didn't post it, A$$hole. lol
>
> * Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:*
>
> > Nobody said you did, "asshole".
>
> lol
>
> See what

<discard>

You forgot to explain why you would feel the need to defend yourself
against something that you had absolutely no part in what so ever. Your
name didn't even appear, yet you're denying doing it.

Odd, that.


Posted by Anonymous on October 29, 2007, 5:30 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Ari wrote:

> *On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:*
>
> >> I have never insulted you to the best of my belief and knowledge.
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:
>
> > > > ROTFLMAO!
> > > >
> > > > That's the biggest load of shit you've EVER posted.
>
> *ARI:*
>
> > > Except that I didn't post it, A$$hole. lol
>
> * Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender wrote:*
>
> > Nobody said you did, "asshole".
>
> lol
>
> See what remailers do to you? Match that with this absurd, combative,
> over-inflated valuation of yourself (" I have to be Anonymous, I am
> sooooooo important") which flies directly in the face of "I will risk
> all I am important about to play like a child on Usenet 7/24/366"
> combined w/ "I have to uphold my Usenet reputation" shtick you are
> on. You can't keep up with your own allegations.
>
> You want to argue with me? When you can't keep up with your own
> postings? Or be consistent between feeding your fucking ego and
> exposing yourself ("I am Anonymous b/c I am laden with great tasks"
> v.s. "The Boss will kick my ass to the curb")
>
> You're a walking paradox of total bullshit. And a coward to boot.
>
> Fuck off. If I want to banter with kids, techie wannabees, or dark
> corner hiding flashers, I'll go to the nearest kindergarten, Star Trek
> Extravaganza or urban alley where dogs piss.

Poor precious Ari, skittering about from post to post desperately
trying to inject enough venom to make himself feel significant again
after his latest beating.

Old story, bright new day. Almost feel sorry for ya' kidlet.

>
> See ya'.

Ta ta!


Similar ThreadsPosted
Howto setup a certificate authority and create a signed certificate using openssl on Debian sarge March 16, 2005, 10:39 am
What are the real dangers of shared hosting ? May 8, 2004, 7:25 am
Have real exploits of arithmetic overflows happened? February 13, 2007, 12:45 pm
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 24, 2006, 6:05 pm
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 15, 2006, 2:24 am
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 16, 2006, 2:14 am
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 18, 2006, 2:22 am
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 18, 2006, 2:25 am
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 20, 2006, 7:25 am
Re: It's a fake terrorist scare, folks August 24, 2006, 4:20 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy