FYI: Avira reacted about

FYI: Avira reacted about "Shutdown Windows' servers" as malware

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
FYI: Avira reacted about "Shutdown Windows' servers" as malware Volker Birk 08-07-2006
Posted by Volker Birk on August 7, 2006, 10:21 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
They told me by email, that they're scanning intentionally for "Shutdown
Windows' servers", and that they don't want to stop this.

I set them a target until next Monday to stop doing so. Afterwards I'm
intending to engage a lawyer.

The original text in German reads:

---------------------------- snip --------------------------------------
Die von Ihnen eingesendete Datei wird von AntiVir in Zukunft als
'SPR/Tool.KillService' erkannt. Es handelt sich hierbei um keinen
Fehlalarm.

Bitte beachten Sie, dass Security Privacy Risk für möglicherweise
schädliche Software steht.

Die Datei wird nicht direkt als Virus bezeichnet, sie bietet aber die
Möglichkeit, schädliche Prozessabläufe zu generieren - in diesem Fall
das Beenden von Diensten.

Die Erkennung von SPR (Security Privacy Risk) kann aus der Virensuche
ausgeschlossen werden.

Überprüfte Datei(en):
http://www.dingens.org/win32sec.exe
---------------------------- snap --------------------------------------

Yours,
VB.
--
Ich würde schätzen, dass ca. 87% aller spontanen Schätzungen völlig für
den Arsch sind.

        Ralph Angenendt in debate@ccc.de

Posted by Leythos on August 7, 2006, 10:32 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> They told me by email, that they're scanning intentionally for "Shutdown
> Windows' servers", and that they don't want to stop this.
>=20
> I set them a target until next Monday to stop doing so. Afterwards I'm
> intending to engage a lawyer.
>=20
> The original text in German reads:
>=20
> ---------------------------- snip --------------------------------------
> Die von Ihnen eingesendete Datei wird von AntiVir in Zukunft als
> 'SPR/Tool.KillService' erkannt. Es handelt sich hierbei um keinen
> Fehlalarm.
>=20
> Bitte beachten Sie, dass Security Privacy Risk f=FCr m=F6glicherweise
> sch=E4dliche Software steht.
>=20
> Die Datei wird nicht direkt als Virus bezeichnet, sie bietet aber die
> M=F6glichkeit, sch=E4dliche Prozessabl=E4ufe zu generieren - in diesem Fa=
ll
> das Beenden von Diensten.
>=20
> Die Erkennung von SPR (Security Privacy Risk) kann aus der Virensuche
> ausgeschlossen werden.
>=20
> =DCberpr=FCfte Datei(en):
> http://www.dingens.org/win32sec.exe
> ---------------------------- snap --------------------------------------

Finally, some real facts, we know know they are targeting the code that=20
VB is offering to the public.

Now, the real question is why offer a program to shutdown services when=20
you can just document what services should be disabled

It would seem to me that anyone getting this code could trick someone=20
into using it to cause problems on the unsuspecting. =20

--=20

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

Posted by Leythos on August 7, 2006, 10:39 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
void@nowhere.lan says...
> > They told me by email, that they're scanning intentionally for "Shutdow=
n
> > Windows' servers", and that they don't want to stop this.
> >=20
> > I set them a target until next Monday to stop doing so. Afterwards I'm
> > intending to engage a lawyer.
> >=20
> > The original text in German reads:
> >=20
> > ---------------------------- snip -------------------------------------=
-
> > Die von Ihnen eingesendete Datei wird von AntiVir in Zukunft als
> > 'SPR/Tool.KillService' erkannt. Es handelt sich hierbei um keinen
> > Fehlalarm.
> >=20
> > Bitte beachten Sie, dass Security Privacy Risk f=FCr m=F6glicherweise
> > sch=E4dliche Software steht.
> >=20
> > Die Datei wird nicht direkt als Virus bezeichnet, sie bietet aber die
> > M=F6glichkeit, sch=E4dliche Prozessabl=E4ufe zu generieren - in diesem =
Fall
> > das Beenden von Diensten.
> >=20
> > Die Erkennung von SPR (Security Privacy Risk) kann aus der Virensuche
> > ausgeschlossen werden.
> >=20
> > =DCberpr=FCfte Datei(en):
> > http://www.dingens.org/win32sec.exe
> > ---------------------------- snap -------------------------------------=
-
>=20
> Finally, some real facts, we know know they are targeting the code that=
=20
> VB is offering to the public.
>=20
> Now, the real question is why offer a program to shutdown services when=
=20
> you can just document what services should be disabled
>=20
> It would seem to me that anyone getting this code could trick someone=20
> into using it to cause problems on the unsuspecting. =20

For those that don't read German, like me, translated by online free=20
service:

---- translated text ----

The file sent in by you is recognized of AntiVir in the future as a=20
'SPR/Tool.KillService'. It concerns herewith no false alarm. Please=20
you note that Security Privacy Risk stands for possibly injurious=20
software. The file is not designated directly as a virus, it offers=20
however the possibility to generate injurious process flows - in this=20
case the concluding of services. The recognition of SPR (Security=20
Privacy Risk) can be excluded out of the viruses that which is sought.

---- end translation ----

So, if I understand this properly, they are classifying it as a=20
"Possible Risk" based on the function it provides.

Are all of you VB supporters suggesting that the Code does NOT present=20
any risk in any environment?

--=20

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

Posted by on August 7, 2006, 11:29 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Leythos wrote:
> void@nowhere.lan says...
> > > They told me by email, that they're scanning intentionally for "Shutd=
own
> > > Windows' servers", and that they don't want to stop this.
> > >
> > > I set them a target until next Monday to stop doing so. Afterwards I'm
> > > intending to engage a lawyer.
> > >
> > > The original text in German reads:
> > >
> > > ---------------------------- snip -----------------------------------=
---
> > > Die von Ihnen eingesendete Datei wird von AntiVir in Zukunft als
> > > 'SPR/Tool.KillService' erkannt. Es handelt sich hierbei um keinen
> > > Fehlalarm.
> > >
> > > Bitte beachten Sie, dass Security Privacy Risk f=FCr m=F6glicherweise
> > > sch=E4dliche Software steht.
> > >
> > > Die Datei wird nicht direkt als Virus bezeichnet, sie bietet aber die
> > > M=F6glichkeit, sch=E4dliche Prozessabl=E4ufe zu generieren - in diese=
m Fall
> > > das Beenden von Diensten.
> > >
> > > Die Erkennung von SPR (Security Privacy Risk) kann aus der Virensuche
> > > ausgeschlossen werden.
> > >
> > > =DCberpr=FCfte Datei(en):
> > > http://www.dingens.org/win32sec.exe
> > > ---------------------------- snap -----------------------------------=
---
> >
> > Finally, some real facts, we know know they are targeting the code that
> > VB is offering to the public.
> >
> > Now, the real question is why offer a program to shutdown services when
> > you can just document what services should be disabled
> >
> > It would seem to me that anyone getting this code could trick someone
> > into using it to cause problems on the unsuspecting.
>
> For those that don't read German, like me, translated by online free
> service:
>
> ---- translated text ----
>
> The file sent in by you is recognized of AntiVir in the future as a
> 'SPR/Tool.KillService'. It concerns herewith no false alarm. Please
> you note that Security Privacy Risk stands for possibly injurious
> software. The file is not designated directly as a virus, it offers
> however the possibility to generate injurious process flows - in this
> case the concluding of services. The recognition of SPR (Security
> Privacy Risk) can be excluded out of the viruses that which is sought.
>
> ---- end translation ----
>
> So, if I understand this properly, they are classifying it as a
> "Possible Risk" based on the function it provides.
>
> Are all of you VB supporters suggesting that the Code does NOT present
> any risk in any environment?
>
> --
>

I am suggesting that there shouldn't be a double standard. Lots of
software is a possible risk based on the function it provides.

And we know that the sensible thing is not to ban all potentially risky
software, but to allow ones that we know are not intended to be
harmful.

Furthermore, VB's program is not only "not intended to be harmful", and
itnended to be helpful. it actually prompts the user and makes clear
what it is doing.


Posted by Leythos on August 7, 2006, 11:33 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
q_q_anonymous@yahoo.co.uk says...
>=20
> Leythos wrote:
> > void@nowhere.lan says...
> > > > They told me by email, that they're scanning intentionally for "Shu=
tdown
> > > > Windows' servers", and that they don't want to stop this.
> > > >
> > > > I set them a target until next Monday to stop doing so. Afterwards =
I'm
> > > > intending to engage a lawyer.
> > > >
> > > > The original text in German reads:
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------- snip ---------------------------------=
-----
> > > > Die von Ihnen eingesendete Datei wird von AntiVir in Zukunft als
> > > > 'SPR/Tool.KillService' erkannt. Es handelt sich hierbei um keinen
> > > > Fehlalarm.
> > > >
> > > > Bitte beachten Sie, dass Security Privacy Risk f=FCr m=F6glicherwei=
se
> > > > sch=E4dliche Software steht.
> > > >
> > > > Die Datei wird nicht direkt als Virus bezeichnet, sie bietet aber d=
ie
> > > > M=F6glichkeit, sch=E4dliche Prozessabl=E4ufe zu generieren - in die=
sem Fall
> > > > das Beenden von Diensten.
> > > >
> > > > Die Erkennung von SPR (Security Privacy Risk) kann aus der Virensuc=
he
> > > > ausgeschlossen werden.
> > > >
> > > > =DCberpr=FCfte Datei(en):
> > > > http://www.dingens.org/win32sec.exe
> > > > ---------------------------- snap ---------------------------------=
-----
> > >
> > > Finally, some real facts, we know know they are targeting the code th=
at
> > > VB is offering to the public.
> > >
> > > Now, the real question is why offer a program to shutdown services wh=
en
> > > you can just document what services should be disabled
> > >
> > > It would seem to me that anyone getting this code could trick someone
> > > into using it to cause problems on the unsuspecting.
> >
> > For those that don't read German, like me, translated by online free
> > service:
> >
> > ---- translated text ----
> >
> > The file sent in by you is recognized of AntiVir in the future as a
> > 'SPR/Tool.KillService'. It concerns herewith no false alarm. Please
> > you note that Security Privacy Risk stands for possibly injurious
> > software. The file is not designated directly as a virus, it offers
> > however the possibility to generate injurious process flows - in this
> > case the concluding of services. The recognition of SPR (Security
> > Privacy Risk) can be excluded out of the viruses that which is sought.
> >
> > ---- end translation ----
> >
> > So, if I understand this properly, they are classifying it as a
> > "Possible Risk" based on the function it provides.
> >
> > Are all of you VB supporters suggesting that the Code does NOT present
> > any risk in any environment?
> >
> > --
> >
>=20
> I am suggesting that there shouldn't be a double standard. Lots of
> software is a possible risk based on the function it provides.

There is no double standard, vendors know to submit the products to=20
malware detection vendors before it is released or to work with them so=20
that their products are not falsely marked as malware.

Why should one complain if they didn't pre-submit their code for=20
testing/exclusion before releasing it?

> And we know that the sensible thing is not to ban all potentially risky
> software, but to allow ones that we know are not intended to be
> harmful.

How does a vendor determine what is "Intended" based on the number of=20
users that may intend to do anything with a code? It seems to me that=20
you can't be sure what people will do with something once it's released=20
into the public domain, and that's the entire problem.

Discount that this is about VB, what if it was from "John Smith" and=20
released into the public to do the same thing with no mention as to why=20
it was released to public?

> Furthermore, VB's program is not only "not intended to be harmful", and
> itnended to be helpful. it actually prompts the user and makes clear
> what it is doing.

And the intent doesn't mean anything, at least not to malware detection=20
vendors.=20

--=20

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

Similar ThreadsPosted
FYI: Avira detects "Shutdown Windows' servers" by special signature for this tool August 7, 2006, 3:43 pm
HIDS on Windows Servers February 25, 2008, 11:38 am
FYI: Avira corrected their position August 9, 2006, 11:12 am
Computer Forensics - Shutdown or Switch-Off August 23, 2006, 10:47 am
Any TLS 1.1 servers out there? October 12, 2006, 11:08 am
Protecting the Network with Homogeneous servers July 24, 2006, 5:02 am
Software to wipe disk drives on servers and pc January 30, 2008, 4:11 pm
How to get rid of this malware? December 22, 2008, 10:06 am
Possible infection by malware? June 5, 2005, 5:41 pm
Unwanted Malware October 8, 2005, 5:27 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy