Does kernel 2.6 include an NSA backdoor?

Does kernel 2.6 include an NSA backdoor?

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Does kernel 2.6 include an NSA backdoor? plenty900 03-04-2008
Posted by [H]omer on March 5, 2008, 9:37 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
chrisv wrote:
> plenty900@yahoo.com wrote:

>> I was beginning to think
>
> *plonk*

That's uncanny. I was beginning to think the same thing.

--
K.
http://slated.org

.----
| 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense'
| ~ Cory Doctorow, The Guardian. http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
`----

Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
14:37:27 up 75 days, 12:13, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00

Posted by Hadron on March 5, 2008, 9:01 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
plenty900@yahoo.com writes:

>> It might be more complicated than this. They are said to have back doors in
>> *standard protocols* (Linux included) [1,2,3,4] and these are hard to get by
>> unless you are a security professional (I'm not). What about hardware-based
>> hacks [5] (in which case "Intel" might be just an abbreviation)? Remember that
>> they just need to sniff packets and then decrypt successfully in order to gain
>> remote access.
>
> Finally a mature response. I was beginning to think I was dealing with
> 11-year-olds.

No. Just COLA freaks. And in COLA land Linux is perfect.

Posted by William Poaster on March 5, 2008, 9:50 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 1:10 pm, plenty900@yahoo.com wrote in
comp.os.linux.advocacy:

Use a proper newsreader, An attribute to whom you are responding.

--
Mandrake 2008.1 RC1
--On a 64bit system--

Posted by Bill Baka on March 5, 2008, 10:54 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
plenty900@yahoo.com wrote:
>> It might be more complicated than this. They are said to have back doors in
>> *standard protocols* (Linux included) [1,2,3,4] and these are hard to get by
>> unless you are a security professional (I'm not). What about hardware-based
>> hacks [5] (in which case "Intel" might be just an abbreviation)? Remember that
>> they just need to sniff packets and then decrypt successfully in order to gain
>> remote access.
>
> Finally a mature response. I was beginning to think I was dealing with
> 11-year-olds.

If you don't think the NSA (or anybody else) gets into your computer,
how about this, my experience so far. I used a torrent engine to
download 'Dreamgirls' for my daughter. What I got was a crappy copy and
a nasty e-mail from the MPAA police.
About 30 years ago I got a visit from 2 FBI gorillas in $1,000 suits
knocking on my door (at home, 8:00 P.M.) for a very minor infraction of
FCC regulations, and they gave me a pink ticket and a warning that if I
dot another warning it would be a RED ticket. The RED ticket is one step
from having you license pulled for a year.
If you don't think the FBI monitors your activities just write something
that says "A$$a$$inate p-r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t 'WEED'" in it and wait for the
FBI at your door.
I'm not paranoid, I have been hassled over trivial stuff.
A few years back, like 2004 (I think) I was detained by both DHS and FBI
agents on duty at Beale A.F.B. for riding my bike on a PUBLIC road and
taking a few pictures with me 1.2 M Pixel fixed focus el-cheapo camera.
Even after proving I was born here, 3rd generation, they held me for a
local Sheriff to pick me up and take me straight home with the bike
loosely in his trunk.
They do it because they can.
Bill Baka

Posted by Sebastian G. on March 5, 2008, 11:34 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Bill Baka wrote:

> plenty900@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> It might be more complicated than this. They are said to have back doors in
>>> *standard protocols* (Linux included) [1,2,3,4] and these are hard to get by
>>> unless you are a security professional (I'm not). What about hardware-based
>>> hacks [5] (in which case "Intel" might be just an abbreviation)? Remember
that
>>> they just need to sniff packets and then decrypt successfully in order to
gain
>>> remote access.
>> Finally a mature response. I was beginning to think I was dealing with
>> 11-year-olds.
>
> If you don't think the NSA (or anybody else) gets into your computer,
> how about this, my experience so far. I used a torrent engine to
> download 'Dreamgirls' for my daughter. What I got was a crappy copy and
> a nasty e-mail from the MPAA police.


And this requires access to your computer about how far?

> About 30 years ago I got a visit from 2 FBI gorillas in $1,000 suits
> knocking on my door (at home, 8:00 P.M.) for a very minor infraction of
> FCC regulations,


And this requires access to your computer about how far?

> A few years back, like 2004 (I think) I was detained by both DHS and FBI
> agents on duty at Beale A.F.B. for riding my bike on a PUBLIC road and
> taking a few pictures with me 1.2 M Pixel fixed focus el-cheapo camera.
> Even after proving I was born here, 3rd generation, they held me for a
> local Sheriff to pick me up and take me straight home with the bike
> loosely in his trunk.


And this requires access to your computer about how far?

> They do it because they can.

They don't do it because they can't.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Does MD5 include the file name? September 12, 2006, 5:54 pm
Recompiling the kernel July 11, 2005, 3:44 am
HPUX kernel compile??? July 23, 2006, 4:37 pm
Does Windows still have NSA backdoor? January 14, 2007, 8:50 am
HPSBUX02127 SSRT051056 - rev.1 HP-UX Kernel Local Denial of Service (DoS) June 23, 2006, 7:59 am
Secret Sector Backdoor / Security Breach October 22, 2007, 1:02 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy