Dealing with abuse - guidelines?

Dealing with abuse - guidelines?

Secure Home | Search | About
 General Computer Security    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Dealing with abuse - guidelines? Tim Anderson 07-15-2004
Posted by Tim Anderson on July 15, 2004, 2:08 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I'm receiving about 2000 messages per hour, which are bounces of viruses
sent with my email address as a fake return address. I've identified the
machine responsible, and contacted the ISP (a major UK ISP). Here's what
they say:

"...I've contacted the user about this (we do need to give them a warning
first of all instead of blocking their mail straight away, and give them
some time to clear their machines). However, if the problem is still ongoing
tomorrow morning, we will take action."

My question: is this best practice? When I had a similar problem a month or
so ago, the ISP blocked the machine immediately, then sorted the problem
with the user. That makes better sense to me (of course). But are there any
guidelines as to what is appropriate?

Tim




Posted by Leythos on July 15, 2004, 2:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
says...
> I'm receiving about 2000 messages per hour, which are bounces of viruses
> sent with my email address as a fake return address. I've identified the
> machine responsible, and contacted the ISP (a major UK ISP). Here's what
> they say:
>
> "...I've contacted the user about this (we do need to give them a warning
> first of all instead of blocking their mail straight away, and give them
> some time to clear their machines). However, if the problem is still ongoing
> tomorrow morning, we will take action."
>
> My question: is this best practice? When I had a similar problem a month or
> so ago, the ISP blocked the machine immediately, then sorted the problem
> with the user. That makes better sense to me (of course). But are there any
> guidelines as to what is appropriate?

Every ISP is different and handles it in different ways. I know of one
ISP that had a group-home with a NAT and there were about 6 machines
infected with a virus that had it's own SMTP engine - it was sending 1
email every 4 seconds from each machine (I could watch it). They gave
them a weekend to fix it (only took about 20 minutes to fix it once I
got there). Road Runner will actually send postal mail letters (in some
areas) and wait for a reply :)

--
--
spamfree999@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me)


Similar ThreadsPosted
Security Policy - HIPAA Guidelines Template Format 050414 April 14, 2005, 8:38 am
lart.com abuse domain owner is oretek.com's Joe Jared ("Taylor Jimenez") June 30, 2006, 9:02 am
Dealing with warning that certifcate can't be trusted? May 12, 2005, 12:45 pm
which security protocol for dealing with this situation September 27, 2007, 4:45 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy