|
Posted by Mike on June 14, 2007, 3:36 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I was planning on running Kapersky antivirus (not security suite) +
comodo free on an XP Pro machine, but a colleague tells me that Kapersky
comes up with a message saying it won't install if comodo is already
there. Is this true, as I can't find any evidence in google about it
--
Mike News
|
|
Posted by Wilf on June 14, 2007, 4:30 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 14/06/2007 8:36 am, Mike wrote:
> I was planning on running Kapersky antivirus (not security suite) +
> comodo free on an XP Pro machine, but a colleague tells me that Kapersky
> comes up with a message saying it won't install if comodo is already
> there. Is this true, as I can't find any evidence in google about it
It may be true for Kaspersky Internet Security (basically KAV with
firewall and other components) but I'm pretty sure not for KAV. You
could enquire at the Kaspersky home user forum
(http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showforum=4)
where you get fantastic responsive help from users, beta testers and
Kaspersky employees alike.
--
Wilf
|
|
Posted by Ed Mc on June 14, 2007, 3:00 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Mike wrote:
> I was planning on running Kapersky antivirus (not security suite) +
> comodo free on an XP Pro machine, but a colleague tells me that Kapersky
> comes up with a message saying it won't install if comodo is already
> there. Is this true, as I can't find any evidence in google about it
I'm running KAV 6.0.2.621 with Comodo
2.4.18.184 with no problems at all. They seem to
compliment each other just fine.
|
|
Posted by Mike on June 20, 2007, 12:07 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options at 08:36:26 on Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Mike
>I was planning on running Kapersky antivirus (not security suite) +
>comodo free on an XP Pro machine, but a colleague tells me that
>Kapersky comes up with a message saying it won't install if comodo is
>already there. Is this true, as I can't find any evidence in google
>about it
>
I finally got round to testing this last night.
KAV will not install if Comodo Firewall Pro is installed
--
Mike News
|
|
Posted by on June 25, 2007, 11:38 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:07:45 +0100, Mike
>I finally got round to testing this last night.
>KAV will not install if Comodo Firewall Pro is installed
Install KAV first, then Comodo.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Norton AntiVirus VS ZoneAlarm With AntiVirus | May 22, 2005, 8:26 am |
| Re: Kapersky Internet Suite | July 10, 2007, 12:45 pm |
| Re: Kapersky Internet Suite | July 11, 2007, 6:59 am |
| Re: Kapersky Internet Suite | July 12, 2007, 11:46 am |
| Re: Kapersky Internet Suite | July 16, 2007, 4:54 pm |
| Need antivirus For ICS | August 11, 2004, 10:16 am |
| norton antivirus behind firewall | June 2, 2005, 4:46 pm |
| TZ170 Gateway Antivirus | June 16, 2005, 5:32 am |
| Zonealarm Pro with Norton Antivirus | July 19, 2005, 10:16 pm |
| Least cpu-intensive firewall and antivirus? | October 9, 2005, 12:54 pm |
|