|
Posted by ChronJob on January 4, 2008, 11:19 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
>>I'm looking for some technique or other that would allow me to post
>>photos and bios of my favorite morons and half-wits. I'd like this to
>>be fairly anonymous, so that even a subpoena would be ineffective in
>>identifying me.
>
> If you happen to be in the USA, then note that the anonymous
> pampleteering laws literally only protect physical pamplets, not
> electronic discourse. And even using physical pamplets has not
> historically prevented the anonymous pampleteers from being charged
> or losing their jobs or whatnot: the relevant law effectively only
> provides a defence leading to acquital from the charges, or being
> sufficient to get a court order that the job dismissal was invalid.
>
> Thus, in the USA, the right to remain anonymous is relatively thin
> and media-specific.
>
> Beyond that, you would be treading not so much in the area
> where a subpoena would be ineffective in identifying you, but
> rather in the area where the effort to track you down through
> sufficient subpoenas would become inordinate for most purposes.
> But if your "photos and bios" happened to be interpreted as threats
> against the US President, or interpreted as a "terrorism threat"
> then organizations who -do- have sufficient resources might decide
> to go through the trouble.
Thanks Walter.
No, of course not threats, or anything even remotely approaching that sort
of stuff.
I'm just talking about revealing the true nature of some sorts who wield
their power via arbitrary status and malignant-to-psychotic personalities.
You see, morons like Todd just can't conceive of the possibility that
anonymity can be for the good. It frequently is.
So, FUCK OFF Todd!!
ChronJob
| 
XML site map