|
Posted by Walter Roberson on November 23, 2006, 11:55 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>I am trying to configure one of our customer'sPIX firewall's to allow
>SSL OWA (they are currently using http, not https). For some reason
>the commands we have added to other customers PIX firewalls aren't
>working to accomplish this.
>I know the first thing you will all suggest is going to be to upgrade
>the IOS (we are on version 6.3(1)), but this is not an option at this
>point.
For future reference: PIX does not use IOS; it uses an operating system
called Finesse, but more commonly known as "PIX OS".
And yes, I would recommend upgrading to 6.3(6) as soon as that becomes
available.
>PIX Version 6.3(1)
>conduit permit tcp any eq 8060 host yy.yy.yy.11
>conduit permit tcp any eq 9000 host yy.yy.yy.33
>conduit permit tcp any eq 1040 host yy.yy.yy.61
>conduit permit tcp host xx.xx.xx.35eq smtp any
>conduit permit tcp host xx.xx.xx.35eq www any
>conduit permit tcp host xx.xx.xx.35eq https any
>conduit permit ip host xx.xx.xx.45 host 66.207.66.14
>conduit permit icmp any any echo-reply
>conduit permit tcp host xx.xx.xx.40 eq citrix-ica any
>conduit permit udp host xx.xx.xx.40 eq 1604 any
>conduit permit tcp host xx.xx.xx.35 eq domain any
Ah, well, you are trying to use conduits, anything can happen.
cisco converted to access-list / access-group in PIX 5.0(1) .
There was a big rewrite of PIX internals for 6.1, and Cisco
"Won't Fix" any 6.2 or later conduit bug unless it is a major repeatable
crash. I don't believe in trying to debug any 6.x configuration that
uses conduits
>isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share
>isakmp policy 10 encryption des
>isakmp policy 10 hash md5
>isakmp policy 10 group 1
>isakmp policy 10 lifetime 14400
>isakmp policy 15 authentication pre-share
>isakmp policy 15 encryption des
>isakmp policy 15 hash md5
>isakmp policy 15 group 2
>isakmp policy 15 lifetime 14400
Put the group 2 before (lower policy number) the group 1 so that
it will be chosen first if the other side supports it. You want
to have the highest available security negotiated.
|