|
Posted by Walter Roberson on May 22, 2007, 9:57 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>I've been able to get it semi-working by applying the following:
>static (Interface1,Interface2) 10.0.5.200 10.0.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.255
>access-list Interface2toInterface1 extended permit udp host 10.0.5.2 host
10.0.5.200 eq port-range
>access-group Interface2toInterface1 in interface Interface2
>However, it replaces the implicit outbound rule for Interface2 and
>breaks all other outbound traffic on the interface. My question is,
>what can I append to the above access group to put the outbound rule
>back in?
Add in a deny to anything else in Interface 1 that might
present a usable IP to Interface 2 (e.g., other statics or
nat 0 access-list), followed by a permit of 10.0.5/24 to any.
>I've already put in a static route so host1 can get down to host2,
You probably don't need that: if you have a regular default route
for hosts on Interface 1 to go out via the PIX, then the default
route will take care of getting the packets to the PIX for
redistribution to host2.
| 
XML site map